Обложка журнала
Title
PHARMACY AND INTELLECTUAL HEALTH CARE
Language of publication
Russian, English

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPTS

1. Rules for authors

The journal Pharmacy and Intellectual Healthcare accepts original scientific materials that correspond to the profile of the publication and the requirements of publication ethics.

The editorial policy of the journal is based on the principles of scientific integrity, independent peer review and compliance with international standards, including the recommendations of COPE, CSE, ICMJE, EMWA and WAME. Materials that have passed an editorial assessment, an originality check, and a double-blind review procedure are allowed for publication.

2. Types of accepted materials

The following types of materials are accepted for publication: original articles, scientific reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical cases, short reports, methodological materials, editorials and analytical materials.

The journal's topics include the following areas:

search, development and research of medicines;
pharmaceutical technology and industrial pharmacy;
pharmaceutical chemistry, pharmacognosy and methods of drug analysis;
preclinical and clinical studies;
pharmacology, clinical pharmacology and pharmacotherapy;
pharmaceutical business organization and drug provision;
public health, organization and sociology of healthcare, medical and social expertise;
medical informatics, digital technologies and intelligent systems in healthcare;
artificial intelligence in medicine, pharmacy and healthcare;
medical devices based on artificial intelligence and support systems for clinical (medical), pharmaceutical and management decisions;
medical technologies;
pharmacoeconomics and health technology assessment;
biotechnology, bioengineering and innovative biomedical technologies;
regulatory, organizational and managerial issues in medicine and pharmacy.
3. Preparing the article for submission

Before sending the manuscript, the authors confirm that the material meets the requirements of the journal. The manuscript may be returned for revision if at least one of the conditions is not fulfilled.

The article has not been published before and is not under consideration in another journal. If there are special circumstances, the authors provide an explanation in the editorial comments.
The manuscript is original, corresponds to the subject of the journal and the requirements of publication ethics.
The article provides all the necessary information about authors, organizations, ORCID, conflicts of interest, sources of funding, authors' contributions, and compliance with ethical principles.
For electronic sources, where possible, the full Internet URL addresses and the date of access are indicated.
The manuscript meets the stylistic, structural and bibliographic requirements of the journal.
4. General rules for the design of manuscripts

The manuscript is submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format: .doc or .docx. The file should not be protected from editing.

Design requirements:

The page format is A4;
margins – 2 cm on all sides;
font – Times New Roman;
The font size is 14 pt.;
The line spacing is 1.5;
The pages should be numbered in the lower left corner.;
Italics are used for semantic highlighting, not underscores, with the exception of Internet addresses.
It is recommended to name the manuscript file by the surname of the first author and the short title of the article.

Example:
I.I. Ivanov (Pharmacy in AI).docx

Recommended volume of the manuscript:

The original article is 10-20 pages long.;
The review article is 15-30 pages long.
The volume includes the main text, a list of references, tables, figures and captions to them.

The following documents are submitted to the editorial office:

A cover letter.
The full version of the manuscript with information about the authors is on the last page.
Additional materials, if available: drawings in separate files, graphic abstracts, copyright holders' permissions, and ethical approval documents.
5. The manuscript

The manuscript should contain Russian-language and English-language blocks, the main text of the article, a list of references, information about conflicts of interest, sources of funding, contribution of the authors, compliance with ethical principles, as well as the section "Information about the authors", posted on the last page of the full version of the manuscript.

6. Russian-language block

The title page

The title page indicates:

Article type: original article, review article, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinical case, summary, guidelines or analytical material.
UDC.
The title of the article.
Initials and surname of the authors.
Full names of the organizations where the authors work.
Matching authors to organizations using superscript Arabic numerals.
E-mail and phone number of the author responsible for correspondence with the editorial staff.
Information about the authors: ORCID of all authors.
For citation purposes.
Summary and keywords

The resume length is 250-300 words.

The summary of the original article should be structured:

Introduction;
The purpose of the study;
Materials and methods;
Results;
Conclusion.
The summary of the review article should include:

Introduction;
Purpose of the review;
Materials and methods of searching for sources – if available;
Main text / content of the review;
Conclusion.
It is necessary to disclose all abbreviations in the summary, even if they are deciphered in the main text of the article. The text of the resume should be logical, coherent and reflect the main content of the work.

Keywords

After the summary, 5-8 keywords or phrases are indicated.

The keywords should be:

reflect the subject area of the article;
use terms from the text of the manuscript;
facilitate the indexing of articles in search engines and databases;
do not duplicate the full title of the article.
Contribution of the authors

The contribution of each author to the research and preparation of the article should be indicated in the manuscript. The wording should reflect the actual involvement of the authors at certain stages of the work.

It is possible to reflect the participation of the authors in the following stages:

development of the research concept and design;
data collection and analysis;
conducting experiments;
statistical processing;
interpretation of results;
preparation of the article text;
editing the manuscript;
approval of the final version of the article.
An example of the wording: "All the authors made a significant contribution to the development of the research concept, the analysis of the data obtained, the preparation of the text of the article and approved the final version of the manuscript before publication."

7. English-language block

The manuscript should contain an English-language block corresponding to the Russian-language part of the article.

Article title

The title of the article in English must be grammatically correct and fully correspond to the meaning of the Russian-language title.

Authors

The names and initials of the authors are indicated in English in the format:

Ivan I. Ivanov

Affiliation

You must specify the official English-language name of the organization.

Design example:

Mental Health Research Institute 4, Aleutskaya Str., Tomsk, 634014, Russian Federation

Abstract

An English-language resume should correspond to a Russian-language resume in terms of meaning and structure.

For the original article:

Introduction;
Aim;
Materials and methods;
Results and discussion;
Conclusion.
For the review article:

Introduction;
Aim;
Search strategy / Materials and methods – if available;
Review content;
Conclusion.
An abstract may be more detailed than a Russian-language resume. Precise scientific terms should be used when preparing the text, especially when specifying diseases, syndromes, research methods, medicines, and medical technologies.

Keywords

Keywords in English are selected taking into account international terminology. It is recommended to use the Medical Subject Headers (MeSH) thesaurus.

Contribution of the authors

The Contribution of the authors section should correspond to the Russian-language section "Authors' contributions".

For citation

8. Main text

The structure of the original article

The original article should include the following sections:

Introduction.
The purpose of the study.
Materials and methods.
Results.
Discussion.
Conclusion.
Structure of the review article

The review article should include:

Introduction.
The purpose of the review.
Materials and methods of searching for sources – if available.
The main text, divided into thematic subsections.
Conclusion.
The main text of the review should be divided into thematic subsections according to the content of the article.

The names of tables, figures, captions and the main symbols inside the illustrations should be presented in Russian and English.

Clinical observation is recommended to be structured according to the following structure:

Introduction.
Description of the clinical case.
Discussion.
Conclusion.
Informed consent of the patient, if applicable.
Introduction

The introduction substantiates the relevance of the research, briefly analyzes the current state of the problem under study, indicates a scientific gap and formulates the purpose of the work.

The purpose of the study should be formulated clearly, concretely and correspond to the title of the article, the design of the study, the presented results and conclusions.

The purpose of the review should be formulated clearly, concretely and correspond to the title of the article, the chosen topic, the criteria for selecting sources, the content of the review and the conclusions.

Materials and methods

The section should describe the design of the study, the object and materials of the study, the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, data sources, methods used, equipment, software, methods of statistical processing and, if necessary, information about the ethical approval of the study.

The names of medicines are indicated with a lowercase letter in Russian, with the obligatory indication of the international nonproprietary name. If there is no INN, the grouping or chemical name is indicated.

International nonproprietary names of pharmaceutical substances and trade names of medicines are registered in accordance with the State Register of Medicines.

When describing clinical trials of medicinal products, it is necessary to indicate the number and date of the study authorization, as well as information about the registration of the study, if applicable.

Razdel podgotovlen s uchetom rekomendaciy Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)Council of Science Editors (CSE)European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) i World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).

1. Obschie polozheniya

1.1. Publikaciya materialov v recenziruemom nauchnom zhurnale yavlyaetsya vazhnoy formoy nauchnoy kommunikacii i vnosit znachitel'nyy vklad v razvitie farmacevticheskih, medicinskih, organizacionno-upravlencheskih i cifrovyh napravleniy nauki.

Zhurnal «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» ustanavlivaet standarty etichnogo povedeniya dlya vseh uchastnikov redakcionno-izdatel'skogo processa: avtorov, redaktorov, recenzentov, chlenov redakcionnoy kollegii i izdatelya.

1.2. Redakcionnaya politika zhurnala osnovana na principah nauchnoy dobrosovestnosti, ob'ektivnosti, nezavisimogo recenzirovaniya, konfidencial'nosti, uvazheniya avtorskih prav i nedopustimosti plagiata, fal'sifikacii i fabrikacii dannyh.

1.3. Zhurnal prinimaet k rassmotreniyu tol'ko original'nye nauchnye materialy, sootvetstvuyuschie profilyu izdaniya, trebovaniyam publikacionnoy etiki i pravilam oformleniya rukopisey.

Osoboe vnimanie udelyaetsya dostovernosti predstavlennyh dannyh, korrektnosti opisaniya metodov issledovaniya, soblyudeniyu eticheskih principov pri issledovaniyah s uchastiem lyudey i zhivotnyh, a takzhe otvetstvennomu ispol'zovaniyu cifrovyh tehnologiy i sistem iskusstvennogo intellekta.

 

2. Obyazannosti redaktorov

2.1. Reshenie o publikacii

Redaktor zhurnala «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» neset otvetstvennost' za prinyatie resheniya o publikacii rukopisi.

Reshenie o publikacii prinimaetsya na osnovanii nauchnoy znachimosti, aktual'nosti, original'nosti, metodologicheskoy korrektnosti, sootvetstviya profilyu zhurnala i rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya.

Redaktor mozhet konsul'tirovat'sya s chlenami redakcionnoy kollegii, nauchnymi redaktorami i recenzentami pri prinyatii resheniya o publikacii, napravlenii rukopisi na dorabotku, povtornoe recenzirovanie ili otklonenii materiala.

2.2. Ob'ektivnost' i bespristrastnost'

Redaktor ocenivaet rukopis' isklyuchitel'no po ee nauchnomu soderzhaniyu, kachestvu issledovaniya i sootvetstviyu trebovaniyam zhurnala.

Ne dopuskaetsya diskriminaciya avtorov po priznakam pola, vozrasta, grazhdanstva, nacional'nosti, religioznyh vzglyadov, politicheskih ubezhdeniy, dolzhnosti, mesta raboty ili inyh obstoyatel'stv, ne svyazannyh s nauchnym soderzhaniem rukopisi.

2.3. Konfidencial'nost'

Redaktor, chleny redakcionnoy kollegii i sotrudniki redakcii obyazany soblyudat' konfidencial'nost' svedeniy o postupivshih rukopisyah.

Informaciya o rukopisi mozhet byt' raskryta tol'ko avtoram, recenzentam, potencial'nym recenzentam, chlenam redakcionnoy kollegii, nauchnym konsul'tantam i izdatelyu v ob'eme, neobhodimom dlya redakcionno-izdatel'skogo processa.

2.4. Konflikt interesov redaktorov

Redaktor ne dolzhen ispol'zovat' neopublikovannye dannye, poluchennye iz predstavlennyh rukopisey, v lichnyh nauchnyh, professional'nyh ili kommercheskih celyah bez pis'mennogo soglasiya avtorov.

Pri nalichii konflikta interesov, svyazannogo s avtorami, organizaciyami, istochnikami finansirovaniya ili tematikoy rukopisi, redaktor obyazan otkazat'sya ot uchastiya v rassmotrenii dannoy rukopisi i peredat' ee drugomu redaktoru ili chlenu redakcionnoy kollegii.

2.5. Kontrol' za opublikovannymi materialami

Pri vyyavlenii suschestvennyh oshibok, nedostovernyh dannyh, narusheniy publikacionnoy etiki, nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy, dubliruyuschey publikacii ili inyh osnovaniy dlya peresmotra opublikovannogo materiala redakciya prinimaet mery v sootvetstvii s principami nauchnoy dobrosovestnosti.

V zavisimosti ot haraktera situacii redakciya mozhet opublikovat' ispravlenie, redakcionnoe primechanie, vyrazhenie obespokoennosti ili prinyat' reshenie ob otzyve publikacii.

2.6. Rassmotrenie eticheskih pretenziy

Redakciya rassmatrivaet obrascheniya, zhaloby i pretenzii, svyazannye s narusheniem publikacionnoy etiki v predstavlennyh ili opublikovannyh materialah.

Pri neobhodimosti redakciya zaprashivaet ob'yasneniya u avtorov, recenzentov, organizaciy, v kotoryh vypolnyalos' issledovanie, i inyh uchastnikov publikacionnogo processa.

 

3. Obyazannosti recenzentov

3.1. Uchastie v prinyatii redakcionnogo resheniya

Recenzirovanie pomogaet redakcii prinyat' obosnovannoe reshenie o vozmozhnosti publikacii rukopisi, a avtoram — povysit' kachestvo nauchnoy raboty.

Recenzent ocenivaet aktual'nost', nauchnuyu noviznu, metodologicheskuyu korrektnost', dostovernost' rezul'tatov, obosnovannost' vyvodov, kachestvo statisticheskoy obrabotki, polnotu bibliograficheskogo apparata i sootvetstvie rukopisi profilyu zhurnala.

3.2. Kompetentnost' i svoevremennost'

Recenzent, kotoryy ne obladaet dostatochnoy kompetenciey dlya ocenki rukopisi ili ne mozhet vypolnit' recenzirovanie v ustanovlennyy srok, dolzhen uvedomit' redakciyu i otkazat'sya ot recenzirovaniya.

3.3. Konfidencial'nost'

Rukopis', poluchennaya dlya recenzirovaniya, yavlyaetsya konfidencial'nym dokumentom.

Recenzent ne vprave peredavat' rukopis' tret'im licam, obsuzhdat' ee soderzhanie bez razresheniya redakcii ili ispol'zovat' soderzhaschiesya v ney dannye v sobstvennyh interesah.

3.4. Ob'ektivnost' recenzirovaniya

Recenzent obyazan davat' ob'ektivnuyu, argumentirovannuyu i korrektnuyu ocenku rukopisi.

Personal'naya kritika avtorov nedopustima. Zamechaniya dolzhny kasat'sya soderzhaniya, struktury, metodov, rezul'tatov, interpretacii dannyh, oformleniya i nauchnoy obosnovannosti vyvodov.

3.5. Ocenka istochnikov i zaimstvovaniy

Recenzent dolzhen obraschat' vnimanie redakcii na znachimye publikacii po teme issledovaniya, kotorye ne byli uchteny avtorami.

Pri vyyavlenii suschestvennogo shodstva rukopisi s ranee opublikovannymi materialami, priznakov plagiata, samoplagiata, nekorrektnogo citirovaniya ili dubliruyuschey publikacii recenzent obyazan soobschit' ob etom redakcii.

3.6. Konflikt interesov recenzentov

Recenzent ne dolzhen uchastvovat' v rassmotrenii rukopisi pri nalichii konflikta interesov, svyazannogo s avtorami, organizaciyami, istochnikami finansirovaniya, konkurentnymi, professional'nymi, lichnymi ili inymi otnosheniyami.

Neopublikovannye dannye, poluchennye v hode recenzirovaniya, ne mogut ispol'zovat'sya recenzentom bez pis'mennogo soglasiya avtorov.

 

4. Obyazannosti avtorov

4.1. Trebovaniya k dostovernosti rukopisi

Avtory nesut otvetstvennost' za dostovernost' predstavlennyh dannyh, korrektnost' opisaniya metodov issledovaniya, obosnovannost' rezul'tatov i vyvodov.

Rukopis' dolzhna soderzhat' dostatochnoe opisanie materialov, metodov, oborudovaniya, programmnogo obespecheniya, statisticheskoy obrabotki i istochnikov dannyh, pozvolyayuschee ocenit' vosproizvodimost' issledovaniya.

Fal'sifikaciya dannyh, fabrikaciya rezul'tatov, iskazhenie vyvodov, manipulyaciya izobrazheniyami, tablicami, grafikami ili statisticheskimi rezul'tatami nedopustimy.

4.2. Original'nost' i nedopustimost' plagiata

Avtory dolzhny predstavlyat' v zhurnal tol'ko original'nye materialy.

Pri ispol'zovanii idey, dannyh, tekstov, tablic, risunkov, metodik ili vyvodov drugih avtorov neobhodimo korrektno ukazyvat' istochnik.

Plagiat, samoplagiat, nekorrektnoe zaimstvovanie, podmena avtorstva i dubliruyuschaya publikaciya yavlyayutsya narusheniyami publikacionnoy etiki.

4.3. Mnozhestvennaya i odnovremennaya publikaciya

Avtory ne dolzhny napravlyat' odnu i tu zhe rukopis' odnovremenno v neskol'ko zhurnalov.

Materialy, ranee opublikovannye polnost'yu ili chastichno, ne prinimayutsya k rassmotreniyu kak original'naya publikaciya, za isklyucheniem sluchaev, kogda vtorichnaya publikaciya dopustima, soglasovana s redakciey i oformlena v sootvetstvii s mezhdunarodnymi rekomendaciyami.

4.4. Avtorstvo publikacii

Avtorami stat'i mogut byt' ukazany tol'ko lica, vnesshie suschestvennyy vklad v razrabotku koncepcii i dizayna issledovaniya, sbor, analiz ili interpretaciyu dannyh, podgotovku teksta, kriticheskoe redaktirovanie rukopisi i utverzhdenie okonchatel'noy versii stat'i.

Vse lica, vnesshie suschestvennyy vklad v rabotu, dolzhny byt' ukazany v chisle avtorov ili v razdele blagodarnostey v zavisimosti ot haraktera ih uchastiya.

Ne dopuskaetsya vklyuchenie v spisok avtorov lic, ne uchastvovavshih v issledovanii, a takzhe isklyuchenie lic, vnesshih znachimyy vklad v rabotu.

4.5. Vklad avtorov

V rukopisi dolzhen byt' ukazan vklad kazhdogo avtora v provedenie issledovaniya i podgotovku stat'i.

Vklad mozhet vklyuchat' razrabotku koncepcii, dizayn issledovaniya, sbor dannyh, provedenie eksperimentov, statisticheskuyu obrabotku, analiz i interpretaciyu rezul'tatov, podgotovku teksta, redaktirovanie rukopisi i utverzhdenie okonchatel'noy versii stat'i.

4.6. Konflikt interesov

Avtory obyazany raskryvat' vse finansovye, professional'nye, lichnye i inye obstoyatel'stva, kotorye mogli povliyat' na provedenie issledovaniya, interpretaciyu rezul'tatov ili podgotovku rukopisi.

K potencial'nym konfliktam interesov otnosyatsya trudovye ili konsul'tacionnye otnosheniya, poluchenie gonorarov, uchastie v grantah, patenty, zayavki na patenty, akcionernoe uchastie, finansirovanie zainteresovannymi organizaciyami i inye obstoyatel'stva.

Pri otsutstvii konflikta interesov avtory ukazyvayut sootvetstvuyuschuyu deklaraciyu.

4.7. Finansirovanie

Avtory dolzhny ukazat' vse istochniki finansirovaniya issledovaniya, podgotovki rukopisi i publikacii stat'i.

Esli issledovanie ne imelo vneshnego finansirovaniya, avtory ukazyvayut: «Avtory zayavlyayut ob otsutstvii finansirovaniya».

4.8. Issledovaniya s uchastiem lyudey i zhivotnyh

Issledovaniya s uchastiem lyudey dolzhny provodit'sya v sootvetstvii s eticheskimi principami medicinskih issledovaniy, trebovaniyami nadlezhaschey klinicheskoy praktiki i deystvuyuschim zakonodatel'stvom.

V rukopisi neobhodimo ukazat' svedeniya ob odobrenii issledovaniya eticheskim komitetom, nomer protokola i datu zasedaniya, a takzhe svedeniya o poluchenii informirovannogo soglasiya uchastnikov issledovaniya ili ih zakonnyh predstaviteley.

Pri publikacii klinicheskih sluchaev avtory dolzhny obespechit' nevozmozhnost' identifikacii pacienta libo ukazat' nalichie pis'mennogo soglasiya na publikaciyu.

Issledovaniya s ispol'zovaniem eksperimental'nyh zhivotnyh dolzhny provodit'sya s soblyudeniem principov gumannogo obrascheniya, trebovaniy bioetiki i deystvuyuschih normativnyh dokumentov. V rukopisi dolzhny byt' ukazany svedeniya ob odobrenii protokola issledovaniya eticheskim komitetom.

4.9. Dostup k dannym i hranenie materialov

Po zaprosu redakcii avtory dolzhny byt' gotovy predostavit' ishodnye dannye, protokoly issledovaniya, dopolnitel'nye materialy, dokumenty ob eticheskom odobrenii, svedeniya o registracii issledovaniya i inye materialy, neobhodimye dlya proverki dostovernosti rukopisi.

Avtory dolzhny obespechivat' hranenie ishodnyh dannyh v techenie razumnogo sroka posle publikacii v sootvetstvii s trebovaniyami organizacii, v kotoroy vypolneno issledovanie, i deystvuyuschimi normativnymi dokumentami.

4.10. Ispol'zovanie tehnologiy iskusstvennogo intellekta

Pri ispol'zovanii generativnyh sistem iskusstvennogo intellekta pri podgotovke teksta, perevode, obrabotke dannyh, sozdanii izobrazheniy, tablic, grafikov ili inyh materialov avtory obyazany ukazat' eto v rukopisi.

Sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta ne mogut byt' ukazany v kachestve avtorov stat'i.

Avtory nesut polnuyu otvetstvennost' za dostovernost' dannyh, korrektnost' ssylok, original'nost' teksta, pravomernost' ispol'zovaniya izobrazheniy, interpretaciyu rezul'tatov i vyvody, dazhe esli pri podgotovke materialov ispol'zovalis' tehnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta.

4.11. Oshibki v opublikovannyh rabotah

Esli avtor obnaruzhil suschestvennuyu oshibku ili netochnost' v opublikovannoy stat'e, on obyazan nezamedlitel'no soobschit' ob etom redakcii.

Redakciya sovmestno s avtorami opredelyaet neobhodimuyu formu ispravleniya: publikaciya ispravleniya, redakcionnogo primechaniya, vyrazheniya obespokoennosti ili otzyv stat'i.

5. Obyazannosti izdatelya

5.1. Izdatel' zhurnala «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» obespechivaet soblyudenie principov publikacionnoy etiki i podderzhivaet redakciyu v realizacii nezavisimoy redakcionnoy politiki.

5.2. Izdatel' ne dolzhen okazyvat' vliyanie na resheniya redakcii o prinyatii ili otklonenii rukopisey.

Resheniya o publikacii prinimayutsya na osnovanii nauchnogo kachestva rukopisi, ee sootvetstviya profilyu zhurnala, rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya i soblyudeniya trebovaniy publikacionnoy etiki.

5.3. Izdatel' okazyvaet podderzhku redakcii pri rassmotrenii pretenziy, svyazannyh s narusheniem publikacionnoy etiki, konfliktami interesov, plagiatom, dubliruyuschimi publikaciyami, oshibkami v opublikovannyh materialah i otzyvom publikaciy.

5.4. Izdatel' sposobstvuet soblyudeniyu nadlezhaschey publikacionnoy praktiki, vnedreniyu sovremennyh standartov nauchnogo redaktirovaniya, recenzirovaniya, ispravleniya oshibok i otzyva publikaciy.

5.5. Izdatel' obespechivaet sohrannost' opublikovannyh materialov, dostupnost' arhivov zhurnala i korrektnoe rasprostranenie svedeniy o publikaciyah v nauchnyh bazah dannyh, informacionnyh sistemah i sistemah nauchnogo citirovaniya.

6. Zaklyuchitel'nye polozheniya

Soblyudenie trebovaniy publikacionnoy etiki yavlyaetsya obyazatel'nym usloviem rassmotreniya i publikacii materialov v zhurnale «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie».

Postuplenie rukopisi v redakciyu oznachaet soglasie avtorov s redakcionnoy politikoy zhurnala, pravilami dlya avtorov, trebovaniyami publikacionnoy etiki i usloviyami rassmotreniya rukopisey.

 

Poryadok opubl statey

Publikaciya statey v zhurnale «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» osuschestvlyaetsya poetapno i vklyuchaet pervichnuyu redakcionnuyu proverku, proverku original'nosti, nauchnoe recenzirovanie, prinyatie redakcionnogo resheniya, podgotovku stat'i k publikacii i razmeschenie materiala v vypuske zhurnala.

1. Podacha rukopisi

Avtor napravlyaet rukopis' v redakciyu cherez sistemu podachi materialov na sayte zhurnala libo inym sposobom, ukazannym redakciey.

V redakciyu predstavlyayutsya:

  1. Polnaya versiya rukopisi so svedeniyami ob avtorah na posledney stranice.
  2. Obezlichennaya versiya rukopisi dlya dvoynogo slepogo recenzirovaniya.
  3. Soprovoditel'noe pis'mo.
  4. Dopolnitel'nye materialy pri nalichii: risunki otdel'nymi faylami, graficheskiy abstrakt, razresheniya pravoobladateley, dokumenty ob eticheskom odobrenii i inye neobhodimye dokumenty.

Podacha rukopisi oznachaet soglasie avtorov s pravilami zhurnala, trebovaniyami k oformleniyu, redakcionnoy politikoy, usloviyami recenzirovaniya i publikacionnoy etikoy.

2. Pervichnaya redakcionnaya proverka

Posle postupleniya rukopis' prohodit pervichnuyu proverku na sootvetstvie profilyu zhurnala, tematicheskim napravleniyam, trebovaniyam k oformleniyu, strukture stat'i i publikacionnoy etike.

Na dannom etape redakciya proveryaet:

  • sootvetstvie stat'i tematike zhurnala;
  • nalichie neobhodimyh strukturnyh razdelov;
  • korrektnost' oformleniya russkoyazychnogo i angloyazychnogo blokov;
  • nalichie svedeniy ob avtorah, ORCID, konflikte interesov, finansirovanii i vklade avtorov;
  • nalichie obezlichennoy versii rukopisi;
  • oformlenie tablic, risunkov i spiska literatury;
  • nalichie dokumentov ob eticheskom odobrenii pri neobhodimosti.

Pri vyyavlenii nesootvetstviy rukopis' mozhet byt' vozvraschena avtoram na dorabotku do napravleniya na recenzirovanie.

3. Proverka original'nosti

Vse postupivshie rukopisi prohodyat proverku na nalichie tekstovyh zaimstvovaniy s ispol'zovaniem sistemy «Antiplagiat» ili inyh specializirovannyh programmnyh sredstv.

Minimal'nyy rekomenduemyy uroven' original'nosti teksta — ne menee 85 %.

Pri vyyavlenii nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy, dubliruyuschey publikacii, samoplagiata, suschestvennyh tekstovyh sovpadeniy ili priznakov narusheniya avtorskih prav redakciya vprave vernut' rukopis' na dorabotku, otkazat' v rassmotrenii ili snyat' material s publikacii.

4. Nauchnoe recenzirovanie

Rukopisi, proshedshie pervichnuyu proverku i proverku original'nosti, napravlyayutsya na nauchnoe recenzirovanie.

V zhurnale primenyaetsya dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie: recenzenty ne poluchayut svedeniya ob avtorah rukopisi, a avtory ne poluchayut svedeniya o recenzentah.

Recenzentami vystupayut specialisty, imeyuschie nauchnye publikacii po tematike stat'i za poslednie 3 goda libo podtverzhdennyy professional'nyy opyt v sootvetstvuyuschey oblasti issledovaniya.

Recenzenty ocenivayut:

      • aktual'nost' i nauchnuyu znachimost' temy;
      • noviznu issledovaniya;
      • korrektnost' celi, zadach i dizayna issledovaniya;
      • obosnovannost' materialov i metodov;
      • kachestvo statisticheskoy obrabotki dannyh;
      • dostovernost' rezul'tatov;
      • obosnovannost' vyvodov;
      • sootvetstvie stat'i profilyu zhurnala;
      • kachestvo oformleniya tablic, risunkov i spiska literatury;
      • soblyudenie trebovaniy publikacionnoy etiki.

5. Reshenie po rezul'tatam recenzirovaniya

Po rezul'tatam recenzirovaniya redakciya prinimaet odno iz sleduyuschih resheniy:

  1. Prinyat' stat'yu k publikacii.
  2. Prinyat' stat'yu posle neznachitel'noy dorabotki.
  3. Napravit' stat'yu na suschestvennuyu dorabotku i povtornoe rassmotrenie.
  4. Napravit' stat'yu na dopolnitel'noe recenzirovanie.
  5. Otklonit' stat'yu.

Reshenie redakcii napravlyaetsya avtoru, otvetstvennomu za perepisku, vmeste s zamechaniyami recenzentov i redakcii pri ih nalichii.

6. Dorabotka rukopisi avtorami

Pri napravlenii rukopisi na dorabotku avtory dolzhny predstavit' ispravlennuyu versiyu stat'i v ustanovlennyy redakciey srok.

K dorabotannoy rukopisi rekomenduetsya prilozhit' otvet na zamechaniya recenzentov i redakcii s ukazaniem vnesennyh izmeneniy.

Esli avtory ne soglasny s otdel'nymi zamechaniyami, oni dolzhny predstavit' argumentirovannoe poyasnenie.

Rukopis', suschestvenno pererabotannaya avtorami, mozhet byt' napravlena na povtornoe recenzirovanie.

7. Prinyatie stat'i k publikacii

Okonchatel'noe reshenie o prinyatii stat'i k publikacii prinimaet redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala s uchetom rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya, nauchnoy znachimosti materiala, sootvetstviya profilyu zhurnala i soblyudeniya trebovaniy publikacionnoy etiki.

Posle prinyatiya stat'i redakciya opredelyaet vypusk zhurnala, v kotorom planiruetsya publikaciya materiala.

8. Redakcionno-izdatel'skaya podgotovka

Prinyataya stat'ya prohodit nauchnoe, literaturnoe i tehnicheskoe redaktirovanie, korrekturu, verstku i podgotovku k razmescheniyu v elektronnoy i/ili pechatnoy versii zhurnala.

Redakciya vprave vnosit' redakcionnye i tehnicheskie ispravleniya, ne izmenyayuschie nauchnogo soderzhaniya stat'i.

Pri neobhodimosti redakciya soglasovyvaet s avtorami utochneniya, svyazannye s terminologiey, tablicami, risunkami, bibliograficheskim opisaniem, angloyazychnym blokom i metadannymi stat'i.

9. Soglasovanie maketa

Okonchatel'nyy maket stat'i napravlyaetsya avtoru, otvetstvennomu za perepisku s redakciey, dlya proverki i soglasovaniya.

Avtor proveryaet korrektnost' svedeniy ob avtorah, nazvaniya stat'i, rezyume, klyuchevyh slov, tablic, risunkov, spiska literatury i inyh elementov publikacii.

Posle soglasovaniya maketa vnesenie suschestvennyh izmeneniy v tekst stat'i ne dopuskaetsya, za isklyucheniem ispravleniya tehnicheskih oshibok po soglasovaniyu s redakciey.

10. Publikaciya stat'i

Posle zaversheniya redakcionno-izdatel'skoy podgotovki stat'ya publikuetsya v ocherednom ili zaplanirovannom vypuske zhurnala.

Opublikovannoy stat'e prisvaivayutsya neobhodimye bibliograficheskie svedeniya, vklyuchaya god, tom, nomer vypuska, stranicy i DOI pri nalichii.

Svedeniya o stat'e razmeschayutsya na sayte zhurnala i mogut peredavat'sya v nauchnye bazy dannyh, informacionnye sistemy i sistemy nauchnogo citirovaniya.

11. Ispravleniya posle publikacii

Pri vyyavlenii oshibok posle publikacii avtory obyazany nezamedlitel'no uvedomit' redakciyu.

V zavisimosti ot haraktera oshibki redakciya mozhet opublikovat' ispravlenie, redakcionnoe primechanie, vyrazhenie obespokoennosti ili prinyat' reshenie ob otzyve publikacii.

Ispravleniya vnosyatsya v sootvetstvii s principami nauchnoy dobrosovestnosti i publikacionnoy etiki.

 

Vse rukopisi, postupayuschie v zhurnal «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie», prohodyat obyazatel'noe nauchnoe recenzirovanie.

1. Pervichnaya proverka

Posle postupleniya rukopis' proveryaetsya redakciey na sootvetstvie tematike zhurnala, trebovaniyam k oformleniyu, strukture stat'i i publikacionnoy etike.

Materialy, ne sootvetstvuyuschie profilyu zhurnala ili trebovaniyam k rukopisyam, mogut byt' vozvrascheny avtoram na dorabotku ili otkloneny bez napravleniya na recenzirovanie.

2. Proverka original'nosti

Vse rukopisi prohodyat proverku v sisteme «Antiplagiat». Minimal'nyy uroven' original'nosti teksta dolzhen sostavlyat' ne menee 85 %.

Pri vyyavlenii nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy, dubliruyuschey publikacii ili priznakov plagiata redakciya vprave otklonit' rukopis'.

3. Dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie

V zhurnale primenyaetsya dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie: recenzenty ne poluchayut svedeniya ob avtorah, a avtory ne poluchayut svedeniya o recenzentah.

Dlya etogo avtory predstavlyayut obezlichennuyu versiyu rukopisi, iz kotoroy udaleny svedeniya ob avtorah, organizaciyah, blagodarnostyah, istochnikah finansirovaniya i inye dannye, pozvolyayuschie ustanovit' avtorstvo.

4. Naznachenie recenzentov

Rukopis' napravlyaetsya specialistam, imeyuschim nauchnye publikacii po tematike stat'i za poslednie 3 goda libo podtverzhdennyy professional'nyy opyt v sootvetstvuyuschey oblasti.

Recenzenty ocenivayut aktual'nost' temy, nauchnuyu noviznu, metodologiyu, dostovernost' rezul'tatov, kachestvo statisticheskoy obrabotki, obosnovannost' vyvodov, oformlenie stat'i i soblyudenie eticheskih trebovaniy.

5. Reshenie redakcii

Po itogam recenzirovaniya redakciya prinimaet odno iz resheniy:

  • prinyat' stat'yu k publikacii;
  • prinyat' posle dorabotki;
  • napravit' na povtornoe recenzirovanie;
  • otklonit' stat'yu.

Reshenie napravlyaetsya avtoru, otvetstvennomu za perepisku, vmeste s zamechaniyami recenzentov i redakcii.

6. Dorabotka stat'i

Pri neobhodimosti avtory predstavlyayut ispravlennuyu versiyu rukopisi i otvet na zamechaniya recenzentov.

Esli izmeneniya suschestvennye, stat'ya mozhet byt' napravlena na povtornoe recenzirovanie.

7. Prinyatie k publikacii

Okonchatel'noe reshenie o publikacii prinimaet redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala s uchetom rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya, nauchnoy znachimosti stat'i i sootvetstviya trebovaniyam publikacionnoy etiki.

 

Vse rukopisi, postupayuschie v zhurnal «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie», prohodyat obyazatel'noe nauchnoe recenzirovanie.

1. Pervichnaya proverka

Posle postupleniya rukopis' proveryaetsya redakciey na sootvetstvie tematike zhurnala, trebovaniyam k oformleniyu, strukture stat'i i publikacionnoy etike.

Materialy, ne sootvetstvuyuschie profilyu zhurnala ili trebovaniyam k rukopisyam, mogut byt' vozvrascheny avtoram na dorabotku ili otkloneny bez napravleniya na recenzirovanie.

2. Proverka original'nosti

Vse rukopisi prohodyat proverku v sisteme «Antiplagiat». Minimal'nyy uroven' original'nosti teksta dolzhen sostavlyat' ne menee 85 %.

Pri vyyavlenii nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy, dubliruyuschey publikacii ili priznakov plagiata redakciya vprave otklonit' rukopis'.

3. Dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie

V zhurnale primenyaetsya dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie: recenzenty ne poluchayut svedeniya ob avtorah, a avtory ne poluchayut svedeniya o recenzentah.

Dlya etogo avtory predstavlyayut obezlichennuyu versiyu rukopisi, iz kotoroy udaleny svedeniya ob avtorah, organizaciyah, blagodarnostyah, istochnikah finansirovaniya i inye dannye, pozvolyayuschie ustanovit' avtorstvo.

4. Naznachenie recenzentov

Rukopis' napravlyaetsya specialistam, imeyuschim nauchnye publikacii po tematike stat'i za poslednie 3 goda libo podtverzhdennyy professional'nyy opyt v sootvetstvuyuschey oblasti.

Recenzenty ocenivayut aktual'nost' temy, nauchnuyu noviznu, metodologiyu, dostovernost' rezul'tatov, kachestvo statisticheskoy obrabotki, obosnovannost' vyvodov, oformlenie stat'i i soblyudenie eticheskih trebovaniy.

5. Reshenie redakcii

Po itogam recenzirovaniya redakciya prinimaet odno iz resheniy:

  • prinyat' stat'yu k publikacii;
  • prinyat' posle dorabotki;
  • napravit' na povtornoe recenzirovanie;
  • otklonit' stat'yu.

Reshenie napravlyaetsya avtoru, otvetstvennomu za perepisku, vmeste s zamechaniyami recenzentov i redakcii.

6. Dorabotka stat'i

Pri neobhodimosti avtory predstavlyayut ispravlennuyu versiyu rukopisi i otvet na zamechaniya recenzentov.

Esli izmeneniya suschestvennye, stat'ya mozhet byt' napravlena na povtornoe recenzirovanie.

7. Prinyatie k publikacii

Okonchatel'noe reshenie o publikacii prinimaet redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala s uchetom rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya, nauchnoy znachimosti stat'i i sootvetstviya trebovaniyam publikacionnoy etiki.

Publikaciya statey v zhurnale «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» dlya avtorov yavlyaetsya besplatnoy.

Redakciya ne vzimaet platu za podachu rukopisi, rassmotrenie, proverku original'nosti, recenzirovanie, redaktirovanie, korrekturu, verstku i publikaciyu stat'i v planovom vypuske zhurnala.

Platnye uslugi mogut predostavlyat'sya tol'ko po zaprosu avtorov i posle prohozhdeniya recenzirovaniya:

  • vneocherednaya publikaciya stat'i;
  • publikaciya stat'i s ukazaniem grantovoy podderzhki, gosudarstvennogo zadaniya, fonda, temy NIOKR ili inoy formy finansirovaniya;
  • dopolnitel'nye redakcionno-izdatel'skie uslugi: perevod, nauchnoe redaktirovanie, podgotovka illyustraciy i graficheskogo abstrakta.

Oplata dopolnitel'nyh uslug ne vliyaet na rezul'taty recenzirovaniya i reshenie redakcionnoy kollegii o publikacii stat'i.

Stoimost' uslug razmeschaetsya na sayte zhurnala ili predostavlyaetsya redakciey po zaprosu.

Deklaraciya ob ispol'zovanii iskusstvennogo intellekta

Avtory obyazany ukazat', ispol'zovalis' li tehnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta pri podgotovke rukopisi, obrabotke dannyh, perevode, sozdanii tablic, risunkov, grafikov, izobrazheniy ili inyh materialov.

Sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta ne mogut byt' ukazany v kachestve avtorov stat'i, poskol'ku ne nesut otvetstvennosti za soderzhanie, dostovernost' dannyh, interpretaciyu rezul'tatov i soblyudenie publikacionnoy etiki.

Otvetstvennost' za nauchnoe soderzhanie stat'i, korrektnost' ssylok, original'nost' teksta, dostovernost' rezul'tatov, pravomernost' ispol'zovaniya materialov i okonchatel'nuyu versiyu rukopisi nesut avtory.

Formulirovka pri ispol'zovanii II

Esli tehnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta ispol'zovalis', avtory ukazyvayut eto v razdele «Ispol'zovanie tehnologiy iskusstvennogo intellekta».

Primer:

Pri podgotovke nastoyaschey rukopisi ispol'zovalis' tehnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta dlya yazykovogo redaktirovaniya teksta i proverki stilisticheskoy soglasovannosti otdel'nyh fragmentov. Vse nauchnye polozheniya, dannye, vyvody, ssylki i okonchatel'naya versiya rukopisi provereny i utverzhdeny avtorami.

Ili:

Pri podgotovke nastoyaschey rukopisi ispol'zovalas' sistema iskusstvennogo intellekta: ukazat' naimenovanie instrumenta. Sistema primenyalas' dlya: ukazat' cel' ispol'zovaniya — perevod, redaktirovanie, strukturirovanie teksta, obrabotka dannyh, sozdanie izobrazheniya, podgotovka tablicy i dr. Otvetstvennost' za soderzhanie rukopisi nesut avtory.

Formulirovka pri otsutstvii ispol'zovaniya II

Esli tehnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta ne ispol'zovalis', avtory ukazyvayut:

Avtory zayavlyayut, chto pri podgotovke nastoyaschey rukopisi tehnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta ne ispol'zovalis'.

Vazhnoe uslovie

Ispol'zovanie iskusstvennogo intellekta ne osvobozhdaet avtorov ot otvetstvennosti za soblyudenie trebovaniy nauchnoy dobrosovestnosti, publikacionnoy etiki, avtorskogo prava, konfidencial'nosti dannyh i zaschity personal'noy informacii.

 

Igor' A. Narkevich  — chief editor
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Oksana D. Nemyatyh  — Member of the Editorial Board
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Yuriy V. Miroshnichenko  — Member of the Editorial Board
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL SCIENCES
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Publisher
SPCPU
Founder
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "St. Petersburg Chemical Pharmaceutical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Pharmacy and Intelligent Healthcare is a scientific and practical peer—reviewed journal devoted to topical issues of pharmaceutical and medical sciences, healthcare organization, clinical pharmacology, medical informatics, digital transformation and intelligent technologies in the field of health protection.

The journal publishes the results of fundamental, applied and translational research, scientific reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical observations, methodological and analytical materials of scientific and practical significance.

The journal's topics cover pharmacy, drug provision, pharmacology and clinical pharmacology, public health, healthcare organization, medical informatics, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, pharmacoeconomics, and health technology assessment.

The journal is aimed at researchers, teachers, graduate students, specialists of medical and pharmaceutical organizations, healthcare organizers and experts in the field of digital technologies.

Zhurnal obespechivaet svobodnyy i nezamedlitel'nyy otkrytyy dostup ko vsem opublikovannym materialam. Redakciya ishodit iz principa, chto otkrytoe rasprostranenie rezul'tatov nauchnyh issledovaniy sposobstvuet razvitiyu nauki, povysheniyu dostupnosti znaniy i rasshireniyu mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo obmena.

 

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPTS

1. Rules for authors

The journal Pharmacy and Intellectual Healthcare accepts original scientific materials that correspond to the profile of the publication and the requirements of publication ethics.

The editorial policy of the journal is based on the principles of scientific integrity, independent peer review and compliance with international standards, including the recommendations of COPE, CSE, ICMJE, EMWA and WAME. Materials that have passed an editorial assessment, an originality check, and a double-blind review procedure are allowed for publication.

2. Types of accepted materials

The following types of materials are accepted for publication: original articles, scientific reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical cases, short reports, methodological materials, editorials and analytical materials.

The journal's topics include the following areas:

search, development and research of medicines;
pharmaceutical technology and industrial pharmacy;
pharmaceutical chemistry, pharmacognosy and methods of drug analysis;
preclinical and clinical studies;
pharmacology, clinical pharmacology and pharmacotherapy;
pharmaceutical business organization and drug provision;
public health, organization and sociology of healthcare, medical and social expertise;
medical informatics, digital technologies and intelligent systems in healthcare;
artificial intelligence in medicine, pharmacy and healthcare;
medical devices based on artificial intelligence and support systems for clinical (medical), pharmaceutical and management decisions;
medical technologies;
pharmacoeconomics and health technology assessment;
biotechnology, bioengineering and innovative biomedical technologies;
regulatory, organizational and managerial issues in medicine and pharmacy.
3. Preparing the article for submission

Before sending the manuscript, the authors confirm that the material meets the requirements of the journal. The manuscript may be returned for revision if at least one of the conditions is not fulfilled.

The article has not been published before and is not under consideration in another journal. If there are special circumstances, the authors provide an explanation in the editorial comments.
The manuscript is original, corresponds to the subject of the journal and the requirements of publication ethics.
The article provides all the necessary information about authors, organizations, ORCID, conflicts of interest, sources of funding, authors' contributions, and compliance with ethical principles.
For electronic sources, where possible, the full Internet URL addresses and the date of access are indicated.
The manuscript meets the stylistic, structural and bibliographic requirements of the journal.
4. General rules for the design of manuscripts

The manuscript is submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format: .doc or .docx. The file should not be protected from editing.

Design requirements:

The page format is A4;
margins – 2 cm on all sides;
font – Times New Roman;
The font size is 14 pt.;
The line spacing is 1.5;
The pages should be numbered in the lower left corner.;
Italics are used for semantic highlighting, not underscores, with the exception of Internet addresses.
It is recommended to name the manuscript file by the surname of the first author and the short title of the article.

Example:
I.I. Ivanov (Pharmacy in AI).docx

Recommended volume of the manuscript:

The original article is 10-20 pages long.;
The review article is 15-30 pages long.
The volume includes the main text, a list of references, tables, figures and captions to them.

The following documents are submitted to the editorial office:

A cover letter.
The full version of the manuscript with information about the authors is on the last page.
Additional materials, if available: drawings in separate files, graphic abstracts, copyright holders' permissions, and ethical approval documents.
5. The manuscript

The manuscript should contain Russian-language and English-language blocks, the main text of the article, a list of references, information about conflicts of interest, sources of funding, contribution of the authors, compliance with ethical principles, as well as the section "Information about the authors", posted on the last page of the full version of the manuscript.

6. Russian-language block

The title page

The title page indicates:

Article type: original article, review article, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinical case, summary, guidelines or analytical material.
UDC.
The title of the article.
Initials and surname of the authors.
Full names of the organizations where the authors work.
Matching authors to organizations using superscript Arabic numerals.
E-mail and phone number of the author responsible for correspondence with the editorial staff.
Information about the authors: ORCID of all authors.
For citation purposes.
Summary and keywords

The resume length is 250-300 words.

The summary of the original article should be structured:

Introduction;
The purpose of the study;
Materials and methods;
Results;
Conclusion.
The summary of the review article should include:

Introduction;
Purpose of the review;
Materials and methods of searching for sources – if available;
Main text / content of the review;
Conclusion.
It is necessary to disclose all abbreviations in the summary, even if they are deciphered in the main text of the article. The text of the resume should be logical, coherent and reflect the main content of the work.

Keywords

After the summary, 5-8 keywords or phrases are indicated.

The keywords should be:

reflect the subject area of the article;
use terms from the text of the manuscript;
facilitate the indexing of articles in search engines and databases;
do not duplicate the full title of the article.
Contribution of the authors

The contribution of each author to the research and preparation of the article should be indicated in the manuscript. The wording should reflect the actual involvement of the authors at certain stages of the work.

It is possible to reflect the participation of the authors in the following stages:

development of the research concept and design;
data collection and analysis;
conducting experiments;
statistical processing;
interpretation of results;
preparation of the article text;
editing the manuscript;
approval of the final version of the article.
An example of the wording: "All the authors made a significant contribution to the development of the research concept, the analysis of the data obtained, the preparation of the text of the article and approved the final version of the manuscript before publication."

7. English-language block

The manuscript should contain an English-language block corresponding to the Russian-language part of the article.

Article title

The title of the article in English must be grammatically correct and fully correspond to the meaning of the Russian-language title.

Authors

The names and initials of the authors are indicated in English in the format:

Ivan I. Ivanov

Affiliation

You must specify the official English-language name of the organization.

Design example:

Mental Health Research Institute 4, Aleutskaya Str., Tomsk, 634014, Russian Federation

Abstract

An English-language resume should correspond to a Russian-language resume in terms of meaning and structure.

For the original article:

Introduction;
Aim;
Materials and methods;
Results and discussion;
Conclusion.
For the review article:

Introduction;
Aim;
Search strategy / Materials and methods – if available;
Review content;
Conclusion.
An abstract may be more detailed than a Russian-language resume. Precise scientific terms should be used when preparing the text, especially when specifying diseases, syndromes, research methods, medicines, and medical technologies.

Keywords

Keywords in English are selected taking into account international terminology. It is recommended to use the Medical Subject Headers (MeSH) thesaurus.

Contribution of the authors

The Contribution of the authors section should correspond to the Russian-language section "Authors' contributions".

For citation

8. Main text

The structure of the original article

The original article should include the following sections:

Introduction.
The purpose of the study.
Materials and methods.
Results.
Discussion.
Conclusion.
Structure of the review article

The review article should include:

Introduction.
The purpose of the review.
Materials and methods of searching for sources – if available.
The main text, divided into thematic subsections.
Conclusion.
The main text of the review should be divided into thematic subsections according to the content of the article.

The names of tables, figures, captions and the main symbols inside the illustrations should be presented in Russian and English.

Clinical observation is recommended to be structured according to the following structure:

Introduction.
Description of the clinical case.
Discussion.
Conclusion.
Informed consent of the patient, if applicable.
Introduction

The introduction substantiates the relevance of the research, briefly analyzes the current state of the problem under study, indicates a scientific gap and formulates the purpose of the work.

The purpose of the study should be formulated clearly, concretely and correspond to the title of the article, the design of the study, the presented results and conclusions.

The purpose of the review should be formulated clearly, concretely and correspond to the title of the article, the chosen topic, the criteria for selecting sources, the content of the review and the conclusions.

Materials and methods

The section should describe the design of the study, the object and materials of the study, the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, data sources, methods used, equipment, software, methods of statistical processing and, if necessary, information about the ethical approval of the study.

The names of medicines are indicated with a lowercase letter in Russian, with the obligatory indication of the international nonproprietary name. If there is no INN, the grouping or chemical name is indicated.

International nonproprietary names of pharmaceutical substances and trade names of medicines are registered in accordance with the State Register of Medicines.

When describing clinical trials of medicinal products, it is necessary to indicate the number and date of the study authorization, as well as information about the registration of the study, if applicable.

Razdel podgotovlen s uchetom rekomendaciy Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)Council of Science Editors (CSE)European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) i World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).

1. Obschie polozheniya

1.1. Publikaciya materialov v recenziruemom nauchnom zhurnale yavlyaetsya vazhnoy formoy nauchnoy kommunikacii i vnosit znachitel'nyy vklad v razvitie farmacevticheskih, medicinskih, organizacionno-upravlencheskih i cifrovyh napravleniy nauki.

Zhurnal «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» ustanavlivaet standarty etichnogo povedeniya dlya vseh uchastnikov redakcionno-izdatel'skogo processa: avtorov, redaktorov, recenzentov, chlenov redakcionnoy kollegii i izdatelya.

1.2. Redakcionnaya politika zhurnala osnovana na principah nauchnoy dobrosovestnosti, ob'ektivnosti, nezavisimogo recenzirovaniya, konfidencial'nosti, uvazheniya avtorskih prav i nedopustimosti plagiata, fal'sifikacii i fabrikacii dannyh.

1.3. Zhurnal prinimaet k rassmotreniyu tol'ko original'nye nauchnye materialy, sootvetstvuyuschie profilyu izdaniya, trebovaniyam publikacionnoy etiki i pravilam oformleniya rukopisey.

Osoboe vnimanie udelyaetsya dostovernosti predstavlennyh dannyh, korrektnosti opisaniya metodov issledovaniya, soblyudeniyu eticheskih principov pri issledovaniyah s uchastiem lyudey i zhivotnyh, a takzhe otvetstvennomu ispol'zovaniyu cifrovyh tehnologiy i sistem iskusstvennogo intellekta.

 

2. Obyazannosti redaktorov

2.1. Reshenie o publikacii

Redaktor zhurnala «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» neset otvetstvennost' za prinyatie resheniya o publikacii rukopisi.

Reshenie o publikacii prinimaetsya na osnovanii nauchnoy znachimosti, aktual'nosti, original'nosti, metodologicheskoy korrektnosti, sootvetstviya profilyu zhurnala i rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya.

Redaktor mozhet konsul'tirovat'sya s chlenami redakcionnoy kollegii, nauchnymi redaktorami i recenzentami pri prinyatii resheniya o publikacii, napravlenii rukopisi na dorabotku, povtornoe recenzirovanie ili otklonenii materiala.

2.2. Ob'ektivnost' i bespristrastnost'

Redaktor ocenivaet rukopis' isklyuchitel'no po ee nauchnomu soderzhaniyu, kachestvu issledovaniya i sootvetstviyu trebovaniyam zhurnala.

Ne dopuskaetsya diskriminaciya avtorov po priznakam pola, vozrasta, grazhdanstva, nacional'nosti, religioznyh vzglyadov, politicheskih ubezhdeniy, dolzhnosti, mesta raboty ili inyh obstoyatel'stv, ne svyazannyh s nauchnym soderzhaniem rukopisi.

2.3. Konfidencial'nost'

Redaktor, chleny redakcionnoy kollegii i sotrudniki redakcii obyazany soblyudat' konfidencial'nost' svedeniy o postupivshih rukopisyah.

Informaciya o rukopisi mozhet byt' raskryta tol'ko avtoram, recenzentam, potencial'nym recenzentam, chlenam redakcionnoy kollegii, nauchnym konsul'tantam i izdatelyu v ob'eme, neobhodimom dlya redakcionno-izdatel'skogo processa.

2.4. Konflikt interesov redaktorov

Redaktor ne dolzhen ispol'zovat' neopublikovannye dannye, poluchennye iz predstavlennyh rukopisey, v lichnyh nauchnyh, professional'nyh ili kommercheskih celyah bez pis'mennogo soglasiya avtorov.

Pri nalichii konflikta interesov, svyazannogo s avtorami, organizaciyami, istochnikami finansirovaniya ili tematikoy rukopisi, redaktor obyazan otkazat'sya ot uchastiya v rassmotrenii dannoy rukopisi i peredat' ee drugomu redaktoru ili chlenu redakcionnoy kollegii.

2.5. Kontrol' za opublikovannymi materialami

Pri vyyavlenii suschestvennyh oshibok, nedostovernyh dannyh, narusheniy publikacionnoy etiki, nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy, dubliruyuschey publikacii ili inyh osnovaniy dlya peresmotra opublikovannogo materiala redakciya prinimaet mery v sootvetstvii s principami nauchnoy dobrosovestnosti.

V zavisimosti ot haraktera situacii redakciya mozhet opublikovat' ispravlenie, redakcionnoe primechanie, vyrazhenie obespokoennosti ili prinyat' reshenie ob otzyve publikacii.

2.6. Rassmotrenie eticheskih pretenziy

Redakciya rassmatrivaet obrascheniya, zhaloby i pretenzii, svyazannye s narusheniem publikacionnoy etiki v predstavlennyh ili opublikovannyh materialah.

Pri neobhodimosti redakciya zaprashivaet ob'yasneniya u avtorov, recenzentov, organizaciy, v kotoryh vypolnyalos' issledovanie, i inyh uchastnikov publikacionnogo processa.

 

3. Obyazannosti recenzentov

3.1. Uchastie v prinyatii redakcionnogo resheniya

Recenzirovanie pomogaet redakcii prinyat' obosnovannoe reshenie o vozmozhnosti publikacii rukopisi, a avtoram — povysit' kachestvo nauchnoy raboty.

Recenzent ocenivaet aktual'nost', nauchnuyu noviznu, metodologicheskuyu korrektnost', dostovernost' rezul'tatov, obosnovannost' vyvodov, kachestvo statisticheskoy obrabotki, polnotu bibliograficheskogo apparata i sootvetstvie rukopisi profilyu zhurnala.

3.2. Kompetentnost' i svoevremennost'

Recenzent, kotoryy ne obladaet dostatochnoy kompetenciey dlya ocenki rukopisi ili ne mozhet vypolnit' recenzirovanie v ustanovlennyy srok, dolzhen uvedomit' redakciyu i otkazat'sya ot recenzirovaniya.

3.3. Konfidencial'nost'

Rukopis', poluchennaya dlya recenzirovaniya, yavlyaetsya konfidencial'nym dokumentom.

Recenzent ne vprave peredavat' rukopis' tret'im licam, obsuzhdat' ee soderzhanie bez razresheniya redakcii ili ispol'zovat' soderzhaschiesya v ney dannye v sobstvennyh interesah.

3.4. Ob'ektivnost' recenzirovaniya

Recenzent obyazan davat' ob'ektivnuyu, argumentirovannuyu i korrektnuyu ocenku rukopisi.

Personal'naya kritika avtorov nedopustima. Zamechaniya dolzhny kasat'sya soderzhaniya, struktury, metodov, rezul'tatov, interpretacii dannyh, oformleniya i nauchnoy obosnovannosti vyvodov.

3.5. Ocenka istochnikov i zaimstvovaniy

Recenzent dolzhen obraschat' vnimanie redakcii na znachimye publikacii po teme issledovaniya, kotorye ne byli uchteny avtorami.

Pri vyyavlenii suschestvennogo shodstva rukopisi s ranee opublikovannymi materialami, priznakov plagiata, samoplagiata, nekorrektnogo citirovaniya ili dubliruyuschey publikacii recenzent obyazan soobschit' ob etom redakcii.

3.6. Konflikt interesov recenzentov

Recenzent ne dolzhen uchastvovat' v rassmotrenii rukopisi pri nalichii konflikta interesov, svyazannogo s avtorami, organizaciyami, istochnikami finansirovaniya, konkurentnymi, professional'nymi, lichnymi ili inymi otnosheniyami.

Neopublikovannye dannye, poluchennye v hode recenzirovaniya, ne mogut ispol'zovat'sya recenzentom bez pis'mennogo soglasiya avtorov.

 

4. Obyazannosti avtorov

4.1. Trebovaniya k dostovernosti rukopisi

Avtory nesut otvetstvennost' za dostovernost' predstavlennyh dannyh, korrektnost' opisaniya metodov issledovaniya, obosnovannost' rezul'tatov i vyvodov.

Rukopis' dolzhna soderzhat' dostatochnoe opisanie materialov, metodov, oborudovaniya, programmnogo obespecheniya, statisticheskoy obrabotki i istochnikov dannyh, pozvolyayuschee ocenit' vosproizvodimost' issledovaniya.

Fal'sifikaciya dannyh, fabrikaciya rezul'tatov, iskazhenie vyvodov, manipulyaciya izobrazheniyami, tablicami, grafikami ili statisticheskimi rezul'tatami nedopustimy.

4.2. Original'nost' i nedopustimost' plagiata

Avtory dolzhny predstavlyat' v zhurnal tol'ko original'nye materialy.

Pri ispol'zovanii idey, dannyh, tekstov, tablic, risunkov, metodik ili vyvodov drugih avtorov neobhodimo korrektno ukazyvat' istochnik.

Plagiat, samoplagiat, nekorrektnoe zaimstvovanie, podmena avtorstva i dubliruyuschaya publikaciya yavlyayutsya narusheniyami publikacionnoy etiki.

4.3. Mnozhestvennaya i odnovremennaya publikaciya

Avtory ne dolzhny napravlyat' odnu i tu zhe rukopis' odnovremenno v neskol'ko zhurnalov.

Materialy, ranee opublikovannye polnost'yu ili chastichno, ne prinimayutsya k rassmotreniyu kak original'naya publikaciya, za isklyucheniem sluchaev, kogda vtorichnaya publikaciya dopustima, soglasovana s redakciey i oformlena v sootvetstvii s mezhdunarodnymi rekomendaciyami.

4.4. Avtorstvo publikacii

Avtorami stat'i mogut byt' ukazany tol'ko lica, vnesshie suschestvennyy vklad v razrabotku koncepcii i dizayna issledovaniya, sbor, analiz ili interpretaciyu dannyh, podgotovku teksta, kriticheskoe redaktirovanie rukopisi i utverzhdenie okonchatel'noy versii stat'i.

Vse lica, vnesshie suschestvennyy vklad v rabotu, dolzhny byt' ukazany v chisle avtorov ili v razdele blagodarnostey v zavisimosti ot haraktera ih uchastiya.

Ne dopuskaetsya vklyuchenie v spisok avtorov lic, ne uchastvovavshih v issledovanii, a takzhe isklyuchenie lic, vnesshih znachimyy vklad v rabotu.

4.5. Vklad avtorov

V rukopisi dolzhen byt' ukazan vklad kazhdogo avtora v provedenie issledovaniya i podgotovku stat'i.

Vklad mozhet vklyuchat' razrabotku koncepcii, dizayn issledovaniya, sbor dannyh, provedenie eksperimentov, statisticheskuyu obrabotku, analiz i interpretaciyu rezul'tatov, podgotovku teksta, redaktirovanie rukopisi i utverzhdenie okonchatel'noy versii stat'i.

4.6. Konflikt interesov

Avtory obyazany raskryvat' vse finansovye, professional'nye, lichnye i inye obstoyatel'stva, kotorye mogli povliyat' na provedenie issledovaniya, interpretaciyu rezul'tatov ili podgotovku rukopisi.

K potencial'nym konfliktam interesov otnosyatsya trudovye ili konsul'tacionnye otnosheniya, poluchenie gonorarov, uchastie v grantah, patenty, zayavki na patenty, akcionernoe uchastie, finansirovanie zainteresovannymi organizaciyami i inye obstoyatel'stva.

Pri otsutstvii konflikta interesov avtory ukazyvayut sootvetstvuyuschuyu deklaraciyu.

4.7. Finansirovanie

Avtory dolzhny ukazat' vse istochniki finansirovaniya issledovaniya, podgotovki rukopisi i publikacii stat'i.

Esli issledovanie ne imelo vneshnego finansirovaniya, avtory ukazyvayut: «Avtory zayavlyayut ob otsutstvii finansirovaniya».

4.8. Issledovaniya s uchastiem lyudey i zhivotnyh

Issledovaniya s uchastiem lyudey dolzhny provodit'sya v sootvetstvii s eticheskimi principami medicinskih issledovaniy, trebovaniyami nadlezhaschey klinicheskoy praktiki i deystvuyuschim zakonodatel'stvom.

V rukopisi neobhodimo ukazat' svedeniya ob odobrenii issledovaniya eticheskim komitetom, nomer protokola i datu zasedaniya, a takzhe svedeniya o poluchenii informirovannogo soglasiya uchastnikov issledovaniya ili ih zakonnyh predstaviteley.

Pri publikacii klinicheskih sluchaev avtory dolzhny obespechit' nevozmozhnost' identifikacii pacienta libo ukazat' nalichie pis'mennogo soglasiya na publikaciyu.

Issledovaniya s ispol'zovaniem eksperimental'nyh zhivotnyh dolzhny provodit'sya s soblyudeniem principov gumannogo obrascheniya, trebovaniy bioetiki i deystvuyuschih normativnyh dokumentov. V rukopisi dolzhny byt' ukazany svedeniya ob odobrenii protokola issledovaniya eticheskim komitetom.

4.9. Dostup k dannym i hranenie materialov

Po zaprosu redakcii avtory dolzhny byt' gotovy predostavit' ishodnye dannye, protokoly issledovaniya, dopolnitel'nye materialy, dokumenty ob eticheskom odobrenii, svedeniya o registracii issledovaniya i inye materialy, neobhodimye dlya proverki dostovernosti rukopisi.

Avtory dolzhny obespechivat' hranenie ishodnyh dannyh v techenie razumnogo sroka posle publikacii v sootvetstvii s trebovaniyami organizacii, v kotoroy vypolneno issledovanie, i deystvuyuschimi normativnymi dokumentami.

4.10. Ispol'zovanie tehnologiy iskusstvennogo intellekta

Pri ispol'zovanii generativnyh sistem iskusstvennogo intellekta pri podgotovke teksta, perevode, obrabotke dannyh, sozdanii izobrazheniy, tablic, grafikov ili inyh materialov avtory obyazany ukazat' eto v rukopisi.

Sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta ne mogut byt' ukazany v kachestve avtorov stat'i.

Avtory nesut polnuyu otvetstvennost' za dostovernost' dannyh, korrektnost' ssylok, original'nost' teksta, pravomernost' ispol'zovaniya izobrazheniy, interpretaciyu rezul'tatov i vyvody, dazhe esli pri podgotovke materialov ispol'zovalis' tehnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta.

4.11. Oshibki v opublikovannyh rabotah

Esli avtor obnaruzhil suschestvennuyu oshibku ili netochnost' v opublikovannoy stat'e, on obyazan nezamedlitel'no soobschit' ob etom redakcii.

Redakciya sovmestno s avtorami opredelyaet neobhodimuyu formu ispravleniya: publikaciya ispravleniya, redakcionnogo primechaniya, vyrazheniya obespokoennosti ili otzyv stat'i.

5. Obyazannosti izdatelya

5.1. Izdatel' zhurnala «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» obespechivaet soblyudenie principov publikacionnoy etiki i podderzhivaet redakciyu v realizacii nezavisimoy redakcionnoy politiki.

5.2. Izdatel' ne dolzhen okazyvat' vliyanie na resheniya redakcii o prinyatii ili otklonenii rukopisey.

Resheniya o publikacii prinimayutsya na osnovanii nauchnogo kachestva rukopisi, ee sootvetstviya profilyu zhurnala, rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya i soblyudeniya trebovaniy publikacionnoy etiki.

5.3. Izdatel' okazyvaet podderzhku redakcii pri rassmotrenii pretenziy, svyazannyh s narusheniem publikacionnoy etiki, konfliktami interesov, plagiatom, dubliruyuschimi publikaciyami, oshibkami v opublikovannyh materialah i otzyvom publikaciy.

5.4. Izdatel' sposobstvuet soblyudeniyu nadlezhaschey publikacionnoy praktiki, vnedreniyu sovremennyh standartov nauchnogo redaktirovaniya, recenzirovaniya, ispravleniya oshibok i otzyva publikaciy.

5.5. Izdatel' obespechivaet sohrannost' opublikovannyh materialov, dostupnost' arhivov zhurnala i korrektnoe rasprostranenie svedeniy o publikaciyah v nauchnyh bazah dannyh, informacionnyh sistemah i sistemah nauchnogo citirovaniya.

6. Zaklyuchitel'nye polozheniya

Soblyudenie trebovaniy publikacionnoy etiki yavlyaetsya obyazatel'nym usloviem rassmotreniya i publikacii materialov v zhurnale «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie».

Postuplenie rukopisi v redakciyu oznachaet soglasie avtorov s redakcionnoy politikoy zhurnala, pravilami dlya avtorov, trebovaniyami publikacionnoy etiki i usloviyami rassmotreniya rukopisey.

 

Poryadok opubl statey

Publikaciya statey v zhurnale «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» osuschestvlyaetsya poetapno i vklyuchaet pervichnuyu redakcionnuyu proverku, proverku original'nosti, nauchnoe recenzirovanie, prinyatie redakcionnogo resheniya, podgotovku stat'i k publikacii i razmeschenie materiala v vypuske zhurnala.

1. Podacha rukopisi

Avtor napravlyaet rukopis' v redakciyu cherez sistemu podachi materialov na sayte zhurnala libo inym sposobom, ukazannym redakciey.

V redakciyu predstavlyayutsya:

  1. Polnaya versiya rukopisi so svedeniyami ob avtorah na posledney stranice.
  2. Obezlichennaya versiya rukopisi dlya dvoynogo slepogo recenzirovaniya.
  3. Soprovoditel'noe pis'mo.
  4. Dopolnitel'nye materialy pri nalichii: risunki otdel'nymi faylami, graficheskiy abstrakt, razresheniya pravoobladateley, dokumenty ob eticheskom odobrenii i inye neobhodimye dokumenty.

Podacha rukopisi oznachaet soglasie avtorov s pravilami zhurnala, trebovaniyami k oformleniyu, redakcionnoy politikoy, usloviyami recenzirovaniya i publikacionnoy etikoy.

2. Pervichnaya redakcionnaya proverka

Posle postupleniya rukopis' prohodit pervichnuyu proverku na sootvetstvie profilyu zhurnala, tematicheskim napravleniyam, trebovaniyam k oformleniyu, strukture stat'i i publikacionnoy etike.

Na dannom etape redakciya proveryaet:

  • sootvetstvie stat'i tematike zhurnala;
  • nalichie neobhodimyh strukturnyh razdelov;
  • korrektnost' oformleniya russkoyazychnogo i angloyazychnogo blokov;
  • nalichie svedeniy ob avtorah, ORCID, konflikte interesov, finansirovanii i vklade avtorov;
  • nalichie obezlichennoy versii rukopisi;
  • oformlenie tablic, risunkov i spiska literatury;
  • nalichie dokumentov ob eticheskom odobrenii pri neobhodimosti.

Pri vyyavlenii nesootvetstviy rukopis' mozhet byt' vozvraschena avtoram na dorabotku do napravleniya na recenzirovanie.

3. Proverka original'nosti

Vse postupivshie rukopisi prohodyat proverku na nalichie tekstovyh zaimstvovaniy s ispol'zovaniem sistemy «Antiplagiat» ili inyh specializirovannyh programmnyh sredstv.

Minimal'nyy rekomenduemyy uroven' original'nosti teksta — ne menee 85 %.

Pri vyyavlenii nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy, dubliruyuschey publikacii, samoplagiata, suschestvennyh tekstovyh sovpadeniy ili priznakov narusheniya avtorskih prav redakciya vprave vernut' rukopis' na dorabotku, otkazat' v rassmotrenii ili snyat' material s publikacii.

4. Nauchnoe recenzirovanie

Rukopisi, proshedshie pervichnuyu proverku i proverku original'nosti, napravlyayutsya na nauchnoe recenzirovanie.

V zhurnale primenyaetsya dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie: recenzenty ne poluchayut svedeniya ob avtorah rukopisi, a avtory ne poluchayut svedeniya o recenzentah.

Recenzentami vystupayut specialisty, imeyuschie nauchnye publikacii po tematike stat'i za poslednie 3 goda libo podtverzhdennyy professional'nyy opyt v sootvetstvuyuschey oblasti issledovaniya.

Recenzenty ocenivayut:

      • aktual'nost' i nauchnuyu znachimost' temy;
      • noviznu issledovaniya;
      • korrektnost' celi, zadach i dizayna issledovaniya;
      • obosnovannost' materialov i metodov;
      • kachestvo statisticheskoy obrabotki dannyh;
      • dostovernost' rezul'tatov;
      • obosnovannost' vyvodov;
      • sootvetstvie stat'i profilyu zhurnala;
      • kachestvo oformleniya tablic, risunkov i spiska literatury;
      • soblyudenie trebovaniy publikacionnoy etiki.

5. Reshenie po rezul'tatam recenzirovaniya

Po rezul'tatam recenzirovaniya redakciya prinimaet odno iz sleduyuschih resheniy:

  1. Prinyat' stat'yu k publikacii.
  2. Prinyat' stat'yu posle neznachitel'noy dorabotki.
  3. Napravit' stat'yu na suschestvennuyu dorabotku i povtornoe rassmotrenie.
  4. Napravit' stat'yu na dopolnitel'noe recenzirovanie.
  5. Otklonit' stat'yu.

Reshenie redakcii napravlyaetsya avtoru, otvetstvennomu za perepisku, vmeste s zamechaniyami recenzentov i redakcii pri ih nalichii.

6. Dorabotka rukopisi avtorami

Pri napravlenii rukopisi na dorabotku avtory dolzhny predstavit' ispravlennuyu versiyu stat'i v ustanovlennyy redakciey srok.

K dorabotannoy rukopisi rekomenduetsya prilozhit' otvet na zamechaniya recenzentov i redakcii s ukazaniem vnesennyh izmeneniy.

Esli avtory ne soglasny s otdel'nymi zamechaniyami, oni dolzhny predstavit' argumentirovannoe poyasnenie.

Rukopis', suschestvenno pererabotannaya avtorami, mozhet byt' napravlena na povtornoe recenzirovanie.

7. Prinyatie stat'i k publikacii

Okonchatel'noe reshenie o prinyatii stat'i k publikacii prinimaet redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala s uchetom rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya, nauchnoy znachimosti materiala, sootvetstviya profilyu zhurnala i soblyudeniya trebovaniy publikacionnoy etiki.

Posle prinyatiya stat'i redakciya opredelyaet vypusk zhurnala, v kotorom planiruetsya publikaciya materiala.

8. Redakcionno-izdatel'skaya podgotovka

Prinyataya stat'ya prohodit nauchnoe, literaturnoe i tehnicheskoe redaktirovanie, korrekturu, verstku i podgotovku k razmescheniyu v elektronnoy i/ili pechatnoy versii zhurnala.

Redakciya vprave vnosit' redakcionnye i tehnicheskie ispravleniya, ne izmenyayuschie nauchnogo soderzhaniya stat'i.

Pri neobhodimosti redakciya soglasovyvaet s avtorami utochneniya, svyazannye s terminologiey, tablicami, risunkami, bibliograficheskim opisaniem, angloyazychnym blokom i metadannymi stat'i.

9. Soglasovanie maketa

Okonchatel'nyy maket stat'i napravlyaetsya avtoru, otvetstvennomu za perepisku s redakciey, dlya proverki i soglasovaniya.

Avtor proveryaet korrektnost' svedeniy ob avtorah, nazvaniya stat'i, rezyume, klyuchevyh slov, tablic, risunkov, spiska literatury i inyh elementov publikacii.

Posle soglasovaniya maketa vnesenie suschestvennyh izmeneniy v tekst stat'i ne dopuskaetsya, za isklyucheniem ispravleniya tehnicheskih oshibok po soglasovaniyu s redakciey.

10. Publikaciya stat'i

Posle zaversheniya redakcionno-izdatel'skoy podgotovki stat'ya publikuetsya v ocherednom ili zaplanirovannom vypuske zhurnala.

Opublikovannoy stat'e prisvaivayutsya neobhodimye bibliograficheskie svedeniya, vklyuchaya god, tom, nomer vypuska, stranicy i DOI pri nalichii.

Svedeniya o stat'e razmeschayutsya na sayte zhurnala i mogut peredavat'sya v nauchnye bazy dannyh, informacionnye sistemy i sistemy nauchnogo citirovaniya.

11. Ispravleniya posle publikacii

Pri vyyavlenii oshibok posle publikacii avtory obyazany nezamedlitel'no uvedomit' redakciyu.

V zavisimosti ot haraktera oshibki redakciya mozhet opublikovat' ispravlenie, redakcionnoe primechanie, vyrazhenie obespokoennosti ili prinyat' reshenie ob otzyve publikacii.

Ispravleniya vnosyatsya v sootvetstvii s principami nauchnoy dobrosovestnosti i publikacionnoy etiki.

 

Zhurnal «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» otkryt dlya sotrudnichestva s organizaciyami, rabotayuschimi v sfere farmacii, mediciny, zdravoohraneniya, medicinskih tehnologiy, cifrovyh resheniy, iskusstvennogo intellekta, biotehnologiy, obrazovaniya i nauchno-issledovatel'skoy deyatel'nosti.

Razmeschenie reklamnyh i informacionnyh materialov v zhurnale pozvolyaet predstavit' produkciyu, uslugi, nauchnye razrabotki, obrazovatel'nye programmy i professional'nye meropriyatiya celevoy auditorii: issledovatelyam, prepodavatelyam, vracham, provizoram, specialistam farmacevticheskih i medicinskih organizaciy, organizatoram zdravoohraneniya, ekspertam v oblasti cifrovyh tehnologiy i iskusstvennogo intellekta.

Vozmozhnye formaty razmescheniya

K razmescheniyu prinimayutsya:

  • reklamnye makety v pechatnoy i elektronnoy versii zhurnala;
  • informacionnye materialy o produkcii, uslugah i tehnologiyah;
  • ob'yavleniya o nauchnyh meropriyatiyah, konferenciyah, forumah, shkolah i obrazovatel'nyh programmah;
  • materialy o professional'nyh proektah, laboratornyh, medicinskih, farmacevticheskih i cifrovyh resheniyah;
  • bannery i informacionnye bloki na sayte zhurnala;
  • partnerskie materialy po soglasovaniyu s redakciey.

Trebovaniya k reklamnym materialam

Reklamnye materialy dolzhny sootvetstvovat' profilyu zhurnala, normam professional'noy etiki i deystvuyuschemu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federacii.

K razmescheniyu ne prinimayutsya materialy, soderzhaschie nedostovernuyu, vvodyaschuyu v zabluzhdenie, nekorrektnuyu ili nepodtverzhdennuyu informaciyu.

Reklamodatel' neset otvetstvennost' za dostovernost' svedeniy, ukazannyh v reklamnom materiale, nalichie neobhodimyh razresheniy, soblyudenie avtorskih prav i prav na ispol'zovanie izobrazheniy, tovarnyh znakov, logotipov i inyh ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti.

Redakciya vprave otkazat' v razmeschenii reklamnogo materiala, esli on ne sootvetstvuet tematike zhurnala, trebovaniyam zakonodatel'stva, professional'noy etike ili redakcionnoy politike.

Reklamnye materialy i redakcionnaya nezavisimost'

Razmeschenie reklamy ne vliyaet na redakcionnuyu politiku zhurnala, process recenzirovaniya, prinyatie resheniy o publikacii nauchnyh statey i soderzhanie redakcionnyh materialov.

Reklamnye i partnerskie materialy otdelyayutsya ot nauchnyh publikaciy i pri neobhodimosti markiruyutsya sootvetstvuyuschim obrazom.

Poryadok razmescheniya reklamy

Dlya razmescheniya reklamnogo ili informacionnogo materiala reklamodatel' napravlyaet v redakciyu:

  1. svedeniya ob organizacii;
  2. opisanie predlagaemogo materiala;
  3. gotovyy reklamnyy maket ili tekst dlya soglasovaniya;
  4. zhelaemyy format i srok razmescheniya;
  5. kontaktnye dannye otvetstvennogo lica.

Posle rassmotreniya materialov redakciya soglasovyvaet format razmescheniya, tehnicheskie trebovaniya, sroki publikacii i usloviya sotrudnichestva.

Kontakty dlya reklamodateley

Po voprosam razmescheniya reklamy, informacionnyh materialov i partnerskogo sotrudnichestva obraschat'sya v redakciyu zhurnala «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie».

 

Zhurnal «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» priderzhivaetsya principov prozrachnosti, redakcionnoy nezavisimosti i nedopustimosti vliyaniya finansovyh usloviy na nauchnoe recenzirovanie i prinyatie redakcionnyh resheniy.

1. Obschie polozheniya

Finansovaya politika zhurnala napravlena na obespechenie ustoychivogo redakcionno-izdatel'skogo processa, podderzhki sayta zhurnala, podgotovki materialov k publikacii, razmescheniya statey v elektronnom formate, prisvoeniya identifikatorov DOI, arhivirovaniya publikaciy i prodvizheniya zhurnala v nauchnyh informacionnyh sistemah.

Vse finansovye usloviya, svyazannye s publikaciey, dopolnitel'nymi redakcionno-izdatel'skimi uslugami, perevodom, razmescheniem reklamnyh materialov ili partnerskim sotrudnichestvom, opredelyayutsya redakciey i dovodyatsya do svedeniya zainteresovannyh lic do okazaniya sootvetstvuyuschih uslug.

2. Publikacionnye rashody

Informaciya o nalichii ili otsutstvii publikacionnyh rashodov razmeschaetsya na sayte zhurnala libo predostavlyaetsya redakciey po zaprosu.

Oplata publikacionnyh rashodov, esli ona predusmotrena, mozhet vklyuchat' tehnicheskuyu podgotovku stat'i, verstku, razmeschenie materiala na sayte zhurnala, prisvoenie DOI, podgotovku metadannyh i inye redakcionno-izdatel'skie processy.

Nalichie ili otsutstvie oplaty publikacionnyh rashodov ne vliyaet na rezul'taty recenzirovaniya, reshenie redakcionnoy kollegii i sroki nauchnogo rassmotreniya rukopisi.

3. Besplatnye i dopolnitel'nye uslugi

Rassmotrenie rukopisi, redakcionnaya ocenka i nauchnoe recenzirovanie osuschestvlyayutsya nezavisimo ot oplaty dopolnitel'nyh uslug.

K dopolnitel'nym uslugam mogut otnosit'sya:

  • perevod stat'i ili otdel'nyh elementov rukopisi na angliyskiy yazyk;
  • nauchnoe i literaturnoe redaktirovanie teksta;
  • podgotovka angloyazychnoy versii stat'i;
  • tehnicheskaya dorabotka risunkov, tablic i graficheskih materialov;
  • podgotovka graficheskogo abstrakta;
  • inye redakcionno-izdatel'skie uslugi po soglasovaniyu s avtorami.

Zakaz dopolnitel'nyh uslug yavlyaetsya dobrovol'nym i ne yavlyaetsya usloviem prinyatiya stat'i k publikacii.

4. Redakcionnaya nezavisimost'

Finansirovanie zhurnala, publikacionnye rashody, reklamnye materialy, partnerskie proekty i inye istochniki postupleniy ne okazyvayut vliyaniya na redakcionnuyu politiku zhurnala.

Reshenie o publikacii stat'i prinimaetsya isklyuchitel'no na osnovanii:

  • sootvetstviya rukopisi profilyu zhurnala;
  • aktual'nosti i nauchnoy znachimosti temy;
  • original'nosti issledovaniya;
  • metodologicheskoy korrektnosti;
  • rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya;
  • soblyudeniya trebovaniy publikacionnoy etiki;
  • kachestva podgotovki rukopisi.

5. Reklama i partnerskie materialy

Zhurnal mozhet razmeschat' reklamnye, informacionnye i partnerskie materialy, sootvetstvuyuschie tematike izdaniya i deystvuyuschemu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federacii.

Razmeschenie reklamnyh materialov osuschestvlyaetsya na osnovanii soglasovaniya s redakciey i ne vliyaet na soderzhanie nauchnyh publikaciy, rezul'taty recenzirovaniya i resheniya redakcionnoy kollegii.

Reklamnye i partnerskie materialy otdelyayutsya ot nauchnyh publikaciy i pri neobhodimosti markiruyutsya sootvetstvuyuschim obrazom.

6. Vozvrat denezhnyh sredstv

Usloviya vozvrata denezhnyh sredstv, esli oplata byla proizvedena za publikacionnye ili dopolnitel'nye redakcionno-izdatel'skie uslugi, opredelyayutsya harakterom okazannoy uslugi i usloviyami soglasheniya s avtorom ili organizaciey.

Esli usluga byla okazana v polnom ob'eme, denezhnye sredstva vozvratu ne podlezhat, za isklyucheniem sluchaev, predusmotrennyh zakonodatel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federacii ili otdel'nym soglasheniem storon.

Otkaz v publikacii po rezul'tatam nauchnogo recenzirovaniya ne yavlyaetsya osnovaniem dlya vozvrata sredstv za uzhe okazannye dopolnitel'nye uslugi, esli takie uslugi byli vypolneny po zaprosu avtora.

7. Prozrachnost' finansovyh usloviy

Redakciya obespechivaet otkrytost' i ponyatnost' finansovyh usloviy dlya avtorov, reklamodateley, partnerov i inyh uchastnikov redakcionno-izdatel'skogo processa.

Vse voprosy, svyazannye s publikacionnymi rashodami, dopolnitel'nymi uslugami, reklamoy i partnerskim sotrudnichestvom, soglasovyvayutsya s redakciey do nachala okazaniya uslug.

8. Kontaktnaya informaciya

Po voprosam finansovoy politiki, publikacionnyh rashodov, dopolnitel'nyh uslug, razmescheniya reklamy i partnerskogo sotrudnichestva obraschat'sya v redakciyu zhurnala «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie».

 

Vse rukopisi, postupayuschie v zhurnal «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie», prohodyat obyazatel'noe nauchnoe recenzirovanie.

1. Pervichnaya proverka

Posle postupleniya rukopis' proveryaetsya redakciey na sootvetstvie tematike zhurnala, trebovaniyam k oformleniyu, strukture stat'i i publikacionnoy etike.

Materialy, ne sootvetstvuyuschie profilyu zhurnala ili trebovaniyam k rukopisyam, mogut byt' vozvrascheny avtoram na dorabotku ili otkloneny bez napravleniya na recenzirovanie.

2. Proverka original'nosti

Vse rukopisi prohodyat proverku v sisteme «Antiplagiat». Minimal'nyy uroven' original'nosti teksta dolzhen sostavlyat' ne menee 85 %.

Pri vyyavlenii nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy, dubliruyuschey publikacii ili priznakov plagiata redakciya vprave otklonit' rukopis'.

3. Dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie

V zhurnale primenyaetsya dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie: recenzenty ne poluchayut svedeniya ob avtorah, a avtory ne poluchayut svedeniya o recenzentah.

Dlya etogo avtory predstavlyayut obezlichennuyu versiyu rukopisi, iz kotoroy udaleny svedeniya ob avtorah, organizaciyah, blagodarnostyah, istochnikah finansirovaniya i inye dannye, pozvolyayuschie ustanovit' avtorstvo.

4. Naznachenie recenzentov

Rukopis' napravlyaetsya specialistam, imeyuschim nauchnye publikacii po tematike stat'i za poslednie 3 goda libo podtverzhdennyy professional'nyy opyt v sootvetstvuyuschey oblasti.

Recenzenty ocenivayut aktual'nost' temy, nauchnuyu noviznu, metodologiyu, dostovernost' rezul'tatov, kachestvo statisticheskoy obrabotki, obosnovannost' vyvodov, oformlenie stat'i i soblyudenie eticheskih trebovaniy.

5. Reshenie redakcii

Po itogam recenzirovaniya redakciya prinimaet odno iz resheniy:

  • prinyat' stat'yu k publikacii;
  • prinyat' posle dorabotki;
  • napravit' na povtornoe recenzirovanie;
  • otklonit' stat'yu.

Reshenie napravlyaetsya avtoru, otvetstvennomu za perepisku, vmeste s zamechaniyami recenzentov i redakcii.

6. Dorabotka stat'i

Pri neobhodimosti avtory predstavlyayut ispravlennuyu versiyu rukopisi i otvet na zamechaniya recenzentov.

Esli izmeneniya suschestvennye, stat'ya mozhet byt' napravlena na povtornoe recenzirovanie.

7. Prinyatie k publikacii

Okonchatel'noe reshenie o publikacii prinimaet redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala s uchetom rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya, nauchnoy znachimosti stat'i i sootvetstviya trebovaniyam publikacionnoy etiki.

 

Vse rukopisi, postupayuschie v zhurnal «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie», prohodyat obyazatel'noe nauchnoe recenzirovanie.

1. Pervichnaya proverka

Posle postupleniya rukopis' proveryaetsya redakciey na sootvetstvie tematike zhurnala, trebovaniyam k oformleniyu, strukture stat'i i publikacionnoy etike.

Materialy, ne sootvetstvuyuschie profilyu zhurnala ili trebovaniyam k rukopisyam, mogut byt' vozvrascheny avtoram na dorabotku ili otkloneny bez napravleniya na recenzirovanie.

2. Proverka original'nosti

Vse rukopisi prohodyat proverku v sisteme «Antiplagiat». Minimal'nyy uroven' original'nosti teksta dolzhen sostavlyat' ne menee 85 %.

Pri vyyavlenii nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy, dubliruyuschey publikacii ili priznakov plagiata redakciya vprave otklonit' rukopis'.

3. Dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie

V zhurnale primenyaetsya dvoynoe slepoe recenzirovanie: recenzenty ne poluchayut svedeniya ob avtorah, a avtory ne poluchayut svedeniya o recenzentah.

Dlya etogo avtory predstavlyayut obezlichennuyu versiyu rukopisi, iz kotoroy udaleny svedeniya ob avtorah, organizaciyah, blagodarnostyah, istochnikah finansirovaniya i inye dannye, pozvolyayuschie ustanovit' avtorstvo.

4. Naznachenie recenzentov

Rukopis' napravlyaetsya specialistam, imeyuschim nauchnye publikacii po tematike stat'i za poslednie 3 goda libo podtverzhdennyy professional'nyy opyt v sootvetstvuyuschey oblasti.

Recenzenty ocenivayut aktual'nost' temy, nauchnuyu noviznu, metodologiyu, dostovernost' rezul'tatov, kachestvo statisticheskoy obrabotki, obosnovannost' vyvodov, oformlenie stat'i i soblyudenie eticheskih trebovaniy.

5. Reshenie redakcii

Po itogam recenzirovaniya redakciya prinimaet odno iz resheniy:

  • prinyat' stat'yu k publikacii;
  • prinyat' posle dorabotki;
  • napravit' na povtornoe recenzirovanie;
  • otklonit' stat'yu.

Reshenie napravlyaetsya avtoru, otvetstvennomu za perepisku, vmeste s zamechaniyami recenzentov i redakcii.

6. Dorabotka stat'i

Pri neobhodimosti avtory predstavlyayut ispravlennuyu versiyu rukopisi i otvet na zamechaniya recenzentov.

Esli izmeneniya suschestvennye, stat'ya mozhet byt' napravlena na povtornoe recenzirovanie.

7. Prinyatie k publikacii

Okonchatel'noe reshenie o publikacii prinimaet redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala s uchetom rezul'tatov recenzirovaniya, nauchnoy znachimosti stat'i i sootvetstviya trebovaniyam publikacionnoy etiki.

Publikaciya statey v zhurnale «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie» dlya avtorov yavlyaetsya besplatnoy.

Redakciya ne vzimaet platu za podachu rukopisi, rassmotrenie, proverku original'nosti, recenzirovanie, redaktirovanie, korrekturu, verstku i publikaciyu stat'i v planovom vypuske zhurnala.

Platnye uslugi mogut predostavlyat'sya tol'ko po zaprosu avtorov i posle prohozhdeniya recenzirovaniya:

  • vneocherednaya publikaciya stat'i;
  • publikaciya stat'i s ukazaniem grantovoy podderzhki, gosudarstvennogo zadaniya, fonda, temy NIOKR ili inoy formy finansirovaniya;
  • dopolnitel'nye redakcionno-izdatel'skie uslugi: perevod, nauchnoe redaktirovanie, podgotovka illyustraciy i graficheskogo abstrakta.

Oplata dopolnitel'nyh uslug ne vliyaet na rezul'taty recenzirovaniya i reshenie redakcionnoy kollegii o publikacii stat'i.

Stoimost' uslug razmeschaetsya na sayte zhurnala ili predostavlyaetsya redakciey po zaprosu.

POLITIKA ZASchITY I OBRABOTKI PERSONAL'NYH DANNYH

Nastoyaschaya politika opredelyaet poryadok obrabotki, hraneniya, ispol'zovaniya, rasprostraneniya, zaschity i unichtozheniya personal'nyh dannyh v ramkah deyatel'nosti nauchno-prakticheskogo recenziruemogo zhurnala «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie».

Politika razrabotana v sootvetstvii s zakonodatel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federacii v oblasti personal'nyh dannyh, informacii, informacionnyh tehnologiy i zaschity informacii, vklyuchaya Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.07.2006 № 152-FZ «O personal'nyh dannyh», Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.07.2006 № 149-FZ «Ob informacii, informacionnyh tehnologiyah i o zaschite informacii», a takzhe normativnye akty i trebovaniya Roskomnadzora.

Cel'yu politiki yavlyaetsya obespechenie zaschity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina pri obrabotke ego personal'nyh dannyh, vklyuchaya zaschitu prava na neprikosnovennost' chastnoy zhizni, lichnuyu i semeynuyu taynu.

1. Obschie polozheniya

Operatorom personal'nyh dannyh yavlyaetsya FGBOU VO «Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy himiko-farmacevticheskiy universitet» Minzdrava Rossii, osuschestvlyayuschee obrabotku personal'nyh dannyh v ramkah redakcionno-izdatel'skoy deyatel'nosti zhurnala «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie».

Zhurnal obrabatyvaet personal'nye dannye avtorov, recenzentov, chlenov redakcionnoy kollegii, chitateley, podpischikov, reklamodateley, partnerov i inyh lic, vzaimodeystvuyuschih s redakciey zhurnala.

Obrabotka personal'nyh dannyh osuschestvlyaetsya na zakonnoy i spravedlivoy osnove, s soblyudeniem principov ogranicheniya obrabotki dostizheniem konkretnyh, zaranee opredelennyh i zakonnyh celey.

Ne dopuskaetsya obrabotka personal'nyh dannyh, nesovmestimaya s celyami ih sbora.

2. Personal'nye dannye, kotorye mogut obrabatyvat'sya

Redakciya zhurnala mozhet obrabatyvat' sleduyuschie personal'nye dannye:

  • familiya, imya, otchestvo;
  • familiya, imya, otchestvo na angliyskom yazyke;
  • mesto raboty;
  • dolzhnost';
  • uchenaya stepen';
  • uchenoe zvanie;
  • strukturnoe podrazdelenie: kafedra, laboratoriya, otdel, centr i dr.;
  • gorod, strana;
  • pochtovyy adres organizacii;
  • adres elektronnoy pochty;
  • nomer telefona;
  • ORCID;
  • SPIN-kod;
  • AuthorID RINC;
  • Scopus Author ID;
  • ResearcherID / Web of Science Researcher Profile;
  • svedeniya o nauchnyh napravleniyah;
  • svedeniya o dopolnitel'nyh regaliyah, pochetnyh zvaniyah, chlenstve v akademiyah, professional'nyh soobschestvah, ekspertnyh sovetah i redakcionnyh kollegiyah;
  • svedeniya o vklade avtora v podgotovku stat'i;
  • svedeniya o konflikte interesov;
  • svedeniya ob istochnikah finansirovaniya issledovaniya;
  • svedeniya, ukazannye v soprovoditel'nyh pis'mah, rukopisyah, recenziyah, formah obratnoy svyazi i inyh dokumentah, napravlyaemyh v redakciyu;
  • tehnicheskie dannye, formiruemye pri ispol'zovanii sayta zhurnala, vklyuchaya IP-adres, dannye cookies, svedeniya o brauzere, ustroystve, date i vremeni obrascheniya k saytu.

3. Celi obrabotki personal'nyh dannyh

Personal'nye dannye obrabatyvayutsya v sleduyuschih celyah:

  • priema, registracii, rassmotreniya i publikacii rukopisey;
  • organizacii nauchnogo recenzirovaniya;
  • vzaimodeystviya s avtorami, recenzentami, chlenami redakcionnoy kollegii, chitatelyami i inymi licami;
  • podgotovki redakcionnyh i izdatel'skih materialov;
  • razmescheniya svedeniy ob avtorah, redakcionnoy kollegii, recenzentah i opublikovannyh stat'yah na sayte zhurnala;
  • podgotovki metadannyh nauchnyh publikaciy;
  • peredachi svedeniy o publikaciyah v nauchnye bazy dannyh, informacionnye sistemy i sistemy nauchnogo citirovaniya;
  • prisvoeniya DOI i formirovaniya bibliograficheskih opisaniy;
  • vedeniya redakcionno-izdatel'skogo arhiva;
  • oformleniya dogovorov, soglasheniy, podpiski, reklamnyh i partnerskih materialov;
  • napravleniya informacionnyh soobscheniy, svyazannyh s deyatel'nost'yu zhurnala;
  • obespecheniya funkcionirovaniya sayta zhurnala;
  • ispolneniya trebovaniy zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii;
  • podtverzhdeniya soglasiya sub'ekta personal'nyh dannyh na obrabotku i razmeschenie svedeniy.

4. Pravovye osnovaniya obrabotki personal'nyh dannyh

Obrabotka personal'nyh dannyh osuschestvlyaetsya na osnovanii:

  • soglasiya sub'ekta personal'nyh dannyh na obrabotku personal'nyh dannyh;
  • soglasiya sub'ekta personal'nyh dannyh na rasprostranenie personal'nyh dannyh v sluchayah, kogda svedeniya razmeschayutsya v otkrytom dostupe;
  • neobhodimosti ispolneniya dogovora ili soglasheniya, storonoy kotorogo yavlyaetsya sub'ekt personal'nyh dannyh;
  • neobhodimosti osuschestvleniya redakcionno-izdatel'skoy deyatel'nosti zhurnala;
  • trebovaniy zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii;
  • zakonnogo interesa operatora pri uslovii soblyudeniya prav i svobod sub'ekta personal'nyh dannyh.

5. Soglasie na obrabotku personal'nyh dannyh

Predostavlyaya svedeniya redakcii zhurnala, sub'ekt personal'nyh dannyh podtverzhdaet soglasie na obrabotku personal'nyh dannyh v celyah, svyazannyh s redakcionno-izdatel'skoy deyatel'nost'yu zhurnala.

Soglasie na obrabotku personal'nyh dannyh dolzhno byt' svobodnym, konkretnym, informirovannym, soznatel'nym i odnoznachnym.

V sluchae razmescheniya personal'nyh dannyh na sayte zhurnala, v sostave opublikovannoy stat'i, svedeniy ob avtorah, redakcionnoy kollegii ili inyh informacionnyh materialov redakciya poluchaet soglasie na rasprostranenie takih personal'nyh dannyh v poryadke, predusmotrennom zakonodatel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federacii.

Sub'ekt personal'nyh dannyh vprave otozvat' soglasie na obrabotku personal'nyh dannyh putem napravleniya pis'mennogo obrascheniya v redakciyu zhurnala.

6. Obrabotka personal'nyh dannyh na sayte zhurnala

Pri ispol'zovanii sayta zhurnala mogut avtomaticheski obrabatyvat'sya tehnicheskie dannye, neobhodimye dlya obespecheniya raboty sayta, analiza poseschaemosti, zaschity informacii i povysheniya kachestva raboty elektronnyh servisov.

K takim dannym mogut otnosit'sya IP-adres, dannye cookies, svedeniya o brauzere, tipe ustroystva, operacionnoy sisteme, date i vremeni posescheniya sayta, a takzhe svedeniya o deystviyah pol'zovatelya na sayte.

Ispol'zovanie sayta zhurnala oznachaet soglasie pol'zovatelya na obrabotku tehnicheskih dannyh, esli inoe ne predusmotreno nastroykami brauzera ili zakonodatel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federacii.

Pol'zovatel' mozhet ogranichit' ili otklyuchit' ispol'zovanie cookies v nastroykah brauzera. Pri etom otdel'nye funkcii sayta mogut rabotat' nekorrektno.

7. Peredacha i rasprostranenie personal'nyh dannyh

Personal'nye dannye ne peredayutsya tret'im licam, za isklyucheniem sluchaev, neobhodimyh dlya dostizheniya celey obrabotki personal'nyh dannyh libo predusmotrennyh zakonodatel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federacii.

Peredacha personal'nyh dannyh mozhet osuschestvlyat'sya:

  • v nauchnye bazy dannyh, informacionnye sistemy i sistemy nauchnogo citirovaniya;
  • organizaciyam, obespechivayuschim prisvoenie DOI, razmeschenie i arhivirovanie publikaciy;
  • izdatel'skim, redakcionnym, tehnicheskim i informacionnym servisam, uchastvuyuschim v obespechenii raboty zhurnala;
  • gosudarstvennym organam i inym upolnomochennym organizaciyam v sluchayah, predusmotrennyh zakonodatel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federacii.

Svedeniya ob avtorah, ukazannye v opublikovannoy stat'e, a takzhe svedeniya o chlenah redakcionnoy kollegii razmeschayutsya v otkrytom dostupe na sayte zhurnala i v sostave metadannyh publikaciy pri nalichii sootvetstvuyuschego soglasiya.

8. Transgranichnaya peredacha personal'nyh dannyh

Transgranichnaya peredacha personal'nyh dannyh mozhet osuschestvlyat'sya tol'ko pri nalichii pravovyh osnovaniy i pri soblyudenii trebovaniy zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii.

Pri neobhodimosti peredachi personal'nyh dannyh v inostrannye informacionnye sistemy, mezhdunarodnye bazy dannyh, sistemy nauchnogo citirovaniya ili inye zarubezhnye servisy redakciya obespechivaet soblyudenie trebovaniy zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii o personal'nyh dannyh.

9. Uvedomlenie Roskomnadzora

Operator personal'nyh dannyh v sluchayah, predusmotrennyh zakonodatel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federacii, napravlyaet v Roskomnadzor uvedomlenie o namerenii osuschestvlyat' obrabotku personal'nyh dannyh, uvedomlenie ob izmenenii svedeniy, soderzhaschihsya v ranee napravlennom uvedomlenii, libo uvedomlenie o prekraschenii obrabotki personal'nyh dannyh.

Uvedomleniya oformlyayutsya po ustanovlennym formam Roskomnadzora.

10. Zaschita personal'nyh dannyh

Redakciya zhurnala i operator personal'nyh dannyh prinimayut neobhodimye pravovye, organizacionnye i tehnicheskie mery dlya zaschity personal'nyh dannyh ot nepravomernogo ili sluchaynogo dostupa, unichtozheniya, izmeneniya, blokirovaniya, kopirovaniya, predostavleniya, rasprostraneniya i inyh nepravomernyh deystviy.

K meram zaschity personal'nyh dannyh mogut otnosit'sya:

  • naznachenie lic, otvetstvennyh za organizaciyu obrabotki personal'nyh dannyh;
  • ogranichenie dostupa k personal'nym dannym;
  • ispol'zovanie paroley i inyh sredstv razgranicheniya dostupa;
  • vedenie ucheta lic, imeyuschih dostup k personal'nym dannym;
  • primenenie organizacionnyh i tehnicheskih mer zaschity informacii;
  • hranenie dokumentov i elektronnyh faylov v usloviyah, isklyuchayuschih nesankcionirovannyy dostup;
  • kontrol' soblyudeniya trebovaniy k obrabotke personal'nyh dannyh;
  • ocenka vreda, kotoryy mozhet byt' prichinen sub'ektam personal'nyh dannyh v sluchae narusheniya zakonodatel'stva o personal'nyh dannyh;
  • prinyatie mer po predotvrascheniyu i vyyavleniyu narusheniy pri obrabotke personal'nyh dannyh.

Dostup k personal'nym dannym imeyut tol'ko upolnomochennye lica, uchastvuyuschie v redakcionno-izdatel'skom processe, tehnicheskom soprovozhdenii sayta ili ispolnenii trebovaniy zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii.

11. Ocenka vreda sub'ektam personal'nyh dannyh

Operator personal'nyh dannyh provodit ocenku vreda, kotoryy mozhet byt' prichinen sub'ektam personal'nyh dannyh v sluchae narusheniya trebovaniy zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii o personal'nyh dannyh.

Ocenka vreda provoditsya s uchetom haraktera obrabatyvaemyh personal'nyh dannyh, celey obrabotki, ob'ema dannyh, kategoriy sub'ektov personal'nyh dannyh, sposobov obrabotki, vozmozhnyh posledstviy narusheniya prav sub'ektov personal'nyh dannyh i primenyaemyh mer zaschity.

Rezul'taty ocenki vreda uchityvayutsya pri vybore organizacionnyh i tehnicheskih mer zaschity personal'nyh dannyh.

12. Hranenie personal'nyh dannyh

Personal'nye dannye hranyatsya v techenie sroka, neobhodimogo dlya dostizheniya celey obrabotki, vedeniya redakcionno-izdatel'skogo arhiva, podtverzhdeniya fakta publikacii, obespecheniya nauchnoy citiruemosti, ispolneniya dogovornyh obyazatel'stv i trebovaniy zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii.

Svedeniya, vhodyaschie v sostav opublikovannyh nauchnyh statey i ih metadannyh, mogut hranit'sya bessrochno v celyah obespecheniya nauchnoy citiruemosti, arhivirovaniya publikaciy i sohraneniya nauchnogo rezul'tata.

Personal'nye dannye, obrabotka kotoryh bol'she ne trebuetsya dlya dostizheniya zayavlennyh celey, podlezhat prekrascheniyu obrabotki, obezlichivaniyu ili unichtozheniyu v ustanovlennom poryadke.

13. Unichtozhenie personal'nyh dannyh

Unichtozhenie personal'nyh dannyh osuschestvlyaetsya v sluchayah dostizheniya celey obrabotki, istecheniya sroka hraneniya, otzyva soglasiya sub'ektom personal'nyh dannyh libo pri nalichii inyh osnovaniy, predusmotrennyh zakonodatel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federacii.

Fakt unichtozheniya personal'nyh dannyh podtverzhdaetsya v poryadke, ustanovlennom trebovaniyami Roskomnadzora.

Pri obrabotke personal'nyh dannyh bez ispol'zovaniya sredstv avtomatizacii podtverzhdeniem unichtozheniya mozhet yavlyat'sya akt ob unichtozhenii personal'nyh dannyh. Pri obrabotke s ispol'zovaniem sredstv avtomatizacii unichtozhenie podtverzhdaetsya dokumental'no s uchetom primenyaemyh informacionnyh sistem i tehnicheskih sredstv.

14. Prava sub'ekta personal'nyh dannyh

Sub'ekt personal'nyh dannyh vprave:

  • poluchat' informaciyu ob obrabotke svoih personal'nyh dannyh;
  • trebovat' utochneniya personal'nyh dannyh, esli oni yavlyayutsya nepolnymi, ustarevshimi, netochnymi ili nedostovernymi;
  • trebovat' blokirovaniya ili udaleniya personal'nyh dannyh, obrabatyvaemyh s narusheniem zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii;
  • otozvat' soglasie na obrabotku personal'nyh dannyh;
  • ogranichit' rasprostranenie personal'nyh dannyh, razreshennyh dlya rasprostraneniya;
  • napravlyat' obrascheniya po voprosam obrabotki i zaschity personal'nyh dannyh v redakciyu zhurnala;
  • obzhalovat' deystviya ili bezdeystvie operatora personal'nyh dannyh v upolnomochennyy organ po zaschite prav sub'ektov personal'nyh dannyh ili v sudebnom poryadke.

15. Poryadok obrascheniya sub'ekta personal'nyh dannyh

Dlya realizacii svoih prav sub'ekt personal'nyh dannyh mozhet napravit' obraschenie v redakciyu zhurnala.

V obraschenii rekomenduetsya ukazat':

  • familiyu, imya, otchestvo;
  • kontaktnye dannye dlya napravleniya otveta;
  • sut' obrascheniya;
  • svedeniya, pozvolyayuschie identificirovat' vzaimodeystvie s zhurnalom: avtor stat'i, recenzent, chlen redakcionnoy kollegii, chitatel', podpischik, predstavitel' organizacii i dr.

Redakciya rassmatrivaet obrascheniya sub'ektov personal'nyh dannyh v poryadke i sroki, predusmotrennye zakonodatel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federacii.

16. Aktualizaciya politiki

Nastoyaschaya politika mozhet byt' izmenena pri izmenenii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii, trebovaniy upolnomochennyh organov, struktury redakcionno-izdatel'skogo processa, poryadka raboty sayta zhurnala ili sposobov obrabotki personal'nyh dannyh.

Aktual'naya redakciya politiki razmeschaetsya na sayte zhurnala.

 

Igor' A. Narkevich  — chief editor

St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Oksana D. Nemyatyh  — Member of the Editorial Board

St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Yuriy V. Miroshnichenko  — Member of the Editorial Board

St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

Redakciya nauchnogo zhurnala «Farmaciya i intellektual'noe zdravoohranenie»

FGBOU VO «Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy himiko-farmacevticheskiy universitet» Minzdrava Rossii

(FGBOU VO SPHFU Minzdrava Rossii)

adres: 197376, Rossiyskaya Federaciya, Sankt-Peterburg, ul. Professora Popova, d. 14, litera A.

 

GLAVNYY REDAKTOR

Narkevich Igor' Anatol'evich - d.farm.n, professor, rektor FGBOU VO SPHFU Minzdrava Rossii

 

Po voprosam publikacii statey, recenzirovaniya i vzaimodeystviya s redakciey

E-mail: Fiz2026@yandex.ru

 

The mission of the scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal Pharmacy and Intellectual Healthcare is to develop an interdisciplinary scientific platform combining pharmaceutical, medical, organizational, managerial and digital research in the interests of the modern healthcare system.

The journal publishes the results of fundamental, applied and translational research aimed at improving drug provision, improving the quality and safety of medical care, developing clinical pharmacology, public health, healthcare organization, medical informatics and intelligent technologies.

Special attention is paid to the implementation of innovative solutions in medical and pharmaceutical practice, the digital transformation of healthcare, the use of artificial intelligence, decision support systems, pharmacoeconomic approaches and modern management methods.

The editorial policy of the journal is based on the principles of scientific integrity, independent peer review, publication ethics, open scientific exchange and the practical significance of the published materials.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?